1.0.18 Patch Notes

[NuclearBurrito]

I don’t think you get it. I need to know if talking twice then talking a 3rd time with a break in between will make me spontaneously combust.

[Ellie]

Yes, it’s still 3 in a row

[NuclearBurrito]

Ok cool. That means I can’t target the prince twice as CL and then wait till late game to get a guarenteed conversion off

[Eran_Shmuel]

@Ellie

We don’t need 3 classes talking to people at night.

Kinda negates the whole purpose of the Psychic if the King does the exact same thing.

Well its kinda different because the psychic is guranteed to be BD

[orangeandblack5]

Sarcasm is always the best choice tbh

[RHCube]

@NuclearBurrito

How many times do we need to tell you that ability’s CAN effect 1 class so long as that class is always present! ESPECIALLY with the king.

And how many times do I have to tell you that the abilities will still become useless if the class dies, especially if the class they rely on is unique and dies N1. I know that this doesn’t apply to the king since there is almost always one present, but it would still make butler a better alternative to drunk.

@NuclearBurrito

It wasn’t needed anymore so it was removed.

Why wasn’t it needed?

@NuclearBurrito

Putting it on an evil king however would simply punish correct play which is never a good idea. Same with neutral king because he can side with evils.

Then the higher chance for a good king should be removed. My main issue with this is that a higher chance for a good king + a punishment for executing a good king gives the good king a bit too much of an advantage over the other kings. All kings should be equal in power, one shouldn’t be more powerful than the other.

@NuclearBurrito

Because it should not be able to bypass healing. Why do you say it should?

Healing shouldn’t be able to prevent everything. It’s a bit OP if it can stop almost any attack, and it would make sense that the king bypasses it since the king is supposed to be powerful.

@NuclearBurrito

And it definitely should not bypass visit prevention.

It already does, king’s visits do not count as visiting.

[NuclearBurrito]

@RHCube

And how many times do I have to tell you that the abilities will still become useless if the class dies, especially if the class they rely on is unique and dies N1.

Which is why the Ability’s are always both: Not even secondary Ability’s and Designed to be most useful early on.

@RHCube

Why wasn’t it needed?

Because of the higher chance of good King plus the punishment for killing one.

@RHCube

My main issue with this is that a higher chance for a good king + a punishment for executing a good king gives the good king a bit too much of an advantage over the other kings.

I’ve been over this. These buffs help all 3 Kings. Think of it this way, if a good king is executed how does that help BD? The answer is that it doesn’t. If it did then we would always go for fool’s. That means that the punishment is only useful for deterring the BD from executing the king. Same thing for increasing the odds of being BD. The idea is for the king to be more trustworthy and a bad target for a policy execute. This benefit however helps all kings too. An evil king can use that deturent for as long as he is still alive. If he dies then it failed anyways and that’s the game being played properly.

[NuclearBurrito]

@Ellie

After failing to convert someone two times in a row, if the next conversion fails, it will instead target a random convertable player.

Btw how does this interact with smite?

[orangeandblack5]

That would suck so much

[Ulkesh]

A small ‘quality of life’ suggestion:

Put in class description for the King the chances of being good, neutral or evil. Now, one would have to visit this forum or they won’t know. (especially useful for newer players)

[Lily]

That’s a good idea haven’t seen ideas like this in a long time.