How does that make it invalid though?
I’m inclined to agree, it feels like Ici is kinda just mudslinging without quoting any posts, though I haven’t ISO’d yet so they might be right anyway
@Icibalus can you explain more about what makes his tone dirter with quotes.
I’m kinda confused as to hjaisk response tbh.
I can’t, I’m just relying on what I feel from them. You can’t articulate tone, I just urge people to read one ISO of his village game and one of his wolf game and see what I mean.
2 Likes
It’s just that it feels like his posts here are more incomplete, I suppose. Like there’s something in how they’re written that just isn’t there, and I think that shows a different agenda.
Tonereads are a very real thing by the way.
I dunno, I feel like their tone is similar to SFoL 36 and N&G where they were town.
Strange D1 accusations and being overly defensive is a 2/3 strike on their town play, I just need to see strike 3 in full to reassure myself.
1 Like
In ninjas and guns hjaisk tone was a bunch more memey D1 compared to here, I can’t do quotes till later.
However /Vote Hjaisk
@BlueStorm vote hjaisk with me town bloc 
Oh also I have never seen hjasik make as many one or two word posts as this game as village… except in one game. City of Citizens.
That was one of the thiings we nailed him for. He’d naturally correct that part of his wolf play lol
/vote Ici
A quick ISO on hjasik is what you wanted me to do.
I have done and it’s led me to the conclusion that you’re trying to run a mislynch on them.
1 Like
Explain further. How exactly is me pushing ANYBODY not just ‘trying to run a mislynch on them’ if you disagree with the read.
You’re picking them up on and accusing them of making similar plays from games where they were scum.
As soon as I pick something out that doesn’t fit your quota, instead of re-evaluating your reads, you’re hypocritically dismissing my point.
1 Like