It’s not morally good to save them
If I have the cure to all the world’s problems, then why give it in the first place?
Altruism?
A sense of duty?
Wanting to be popular?
What dictates morals is a consensus of beliefs regarding the topic in question
It’s not necessarily a bad thing. It’s just really apparent, and then people love to judge people based off the fact that they showed hypocrisy
If you have the cure to all the world’s problems then why would you ever not cure all the world’s problems??
woah woah woah. death is a virus that will eventually be stopped. but it should still be possible. i just dont want immortality without a way out.
I more mean at a personal level
Make decisions based on what you believe is the right decision based on your beliefs
Like cheating on a test is “morally” wrong, but if you’re doing it in order to help your grade by all means that’s a reasonable decision
Even that is hard.
For example, you can see me be a hypocrite in mafia academy dead chat. Jake and Marshal did the same thing, but I forgave marshal while making jake seem bad. I still think this way, and I can’t explain it.
thats actually a bit different tho. thats singular immortality, where you continue to live but those around you do not
immortality for everyone, or at least for many people, would be a whole different ball game. it would essentially be like everyone is a frisk/flowey, able to remember everything through the metaphorical resets. they’d be able to keep changing, keep interacting
like, my ideal, is that pain and death and whatnot still happen, but after you die everybody respawns.
unless they well and truly dont want to, not counting the effects of drugs, temporary threats/ whatever
But if you could choose to prevent those problems with no harm to you
and you don’t do that
then you’re responsible for those problems continuing to occur
as a corollary to this I’m personally responsible for somewhere between ~1.5 and ~5 people dying
