No, I think you need some help.
the first step is admitting you have a problem
It’s a problem that you believe that.
did you tell arete what happened
Yes, Arete and I are very concerned
i think you both need to consider that i am the correct one here
to clarify, by “consider” i mean “accept the fact”
You are not in the right here katze, I think we both know this
so you choose to dispute this?
a well known fact?
is it the whetness of water
sigh
You just don’t understand.
marshal, im glad you came
exactly correct, you are
well what do you beleive
i have my thesis and reasoning
but lemme see yours
my dearest sulit, you must be a nonbeliever in science
katze is a mega scientist
exactly! marshal gets it!
…you dip
now, do i have to spell it all out for you?
You shun logic and reasoning. I can’t even look at you.
It would be complete and utter nonsense
im a neutral party on the whetness of water
something in contact with water. Even if it is veeeeeeeeeery little , it is still sliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiightly wet
1 water molecule is not wet
2+ water molecules, in contact with each other, are wet
water can be wet or non wet
because i have nuance you heretics