The “mechanical solving” that is mentioned here is just figuring out what the host would or wouldn’t design. It doesn’t apply to open setups.
Yes it is an argument.
Hosts do that here, as I’ve outlined and for good reason, as those roles typically aren’t designed with being an IC in mind.
That is figuring out if godfathers/tailors exist. You know that in open setups. It doesn’t apply.
It’s not saying that you can only be good host if you disencourage mechanical solving and then bringing few examples of host doing that isn’t argument for what you said
That’s why I’m putting mechanical solving in quotation marks, because that’s not what is being referred to here.
It’s still part if you trust that check /kinda counts as mechanical solving even if frame/tailor exist
If you want to make your doublevoters always town, then make them IC town doublevoters.
I don’t think we’re going anywhere with this honestly and it’s getting into our trademark no u debate.
I think gaming the host design isn’t really a fun approach towards solving the game and very prone to errors. You clearly disagree. Agree to disagree.
That’s just using reads then and not “mechanically solving” and seems unrelated towards this then.
dude a closed setup rolemadness with wonky mechanics is the best tho! for me at least
its the kind of space that gives my kind of play an advantage: when nobody knows the rules, those who can figure them out the fastest are at an advantage
^^^^this^^^^
bullshit, explain it to me
thats kinda it yeah. although i prefer to go for how they interpret actions, and what sorts of things they allow; what “style” they’re going for.
