54321st Poster gets a cookie - mods are cute

Consequentialism is a blanket term for ethical systems under which whether an action is ethical is determined by its consequences

will this be on the test

There’s Virtue Ethics, which states that morality is gained through aspects cultivated within oneself; this one’s out of fashion, but you never know when aristoleanism might come back into fashion.

There’s consequentialism, which Emi and Arete just explained.

There’s Deontological Ethics, which is where the virtue of an action is solely based on whether it violates absolute moral principles defined universally through logic.

and then there’s nihilism

Is that a different name for teleology?

Teleology refers to the analysis of objects based on purpose rather than casuse.

Wtf?

How did I only just now find out that Ici also has a special interest in ethical philosophy

bounces

The last one is me

Sorry I’m not a native english speaker

Teleology and Deontology are the two extremes

Deontology refers to general rules
While telos = goal is refering to the consequences you wanted to achieve

Virtue Ethics and Nihilism are generally not very credible at the moment, one being very weirdly old-fashioned and religious and the other being the official ethical system of nazbol, so moral philosophy is basically an argument between judging actions based on consequences and judging them based on roles. At this point, Hegel is weeing his pants with excitement, because two opposing forces have a synthesis: utlitiarianism.

unfortuantely utilitarianism is kind of terrible

1 Like

My personal philosophy is a weird mix of machiavelli and pierce’s pragmaticism

if there’s a hypothetical afterlife remind me to go find out what hegel, nietzche and marx thought about the 20th and 21st century. that should be fun.

Excuse me

Then again that implies somebody can understand Hegel’s prose. Here is a delightfully understandable excerpt from Hegel’s The Phenomonlogy of Spirit:

image

this is one of the understandable ones

Act utilitarianism is ok

Utilitarism is kinda reasonable

1 Like

it seems that way, but there are deep problems with it, most notably the fact that it’s hard to gague happiness externally, and it neccecarily cannot reward superperogative acts; utilitarianism says that the most moral thing to do is always the only moral thing to do.

Hot take

This is correct and everyone just pretends it isn’t because the alternative is, like, constant paralyzing guilt

i think there are logical consequences of that which I will not elaborate on presently because I have maths homework to do