Well… it feels pretty innocent for me too. But other people in this thread decided its angleshooting.
You literally can
No they didn’t?
As I said above, people here have no idea what angleshooting means.
Then why have people been saying that is considered angleshooting?
The definition of this rule is so broken we can’t even discuss why it’s broken properly.
Like I haven’t read this whole thread but I also guarantee you that has not been stated
…and this right here is a good example of why I’m glad that we’re working to clarify what does and doesn’t qualify.
Yeah Solic just wrong then lol
Exactly. It’s an opinionated rule.
It is wrong.
No, it’s opinionated which is why it needs to go.
No like he’s wrong on a definable level
I’d like to know how orange and Alice are seeing angleshooting.
Because their definition of angleshooting seems kinda reasonable.
We have to teach the others your understanding, tho.
“Angleshooting” is not some made-up FoL term, it has an actual meaning that has carried over to its usage in FM and now here.
Just because a rule leaves itself open to be applied does not make it invalid. If it did, society would literally not be tenable whatsoever, and none of us would be here, on this forum, discussing this right now.
I repeat myself in saying this is a good definition.
Hen. Half of the thread is trying to decide what it actually is.
I want to be able to devise strategies through the setup, not be restricted of information regardless of alignment and
I feel like this conversation lost its point a long time ago
It has
it feels like were beating a dead horse here tbh
The reason “X has finals” doesn’t make a difference is that it isn’t really affecting the gamestate or using information you gained illegitimately to affect the outcome of the game in your favor.
Endlessly battling back and forth
It kind of breaks the back and I think creates divisions between people