Announcement: Updated Policy on Replacements

Tbf- Kyo didn’t say he made all his chats public
He said from now he will

1 Like

I’m practically one of the top activists of this
You’ve placed a hypocripsy accusation on me which is completely unnessecary and uncalled for

Kyo, do you think that chat should have been made public against your will? Are you agreeing with this?

Additionally, my chats had spew in them because they were never intended to go public in the first place
If I intended to make them public at the start I would’ve never spewed what I did in spectator chat

There was no disclaimer at the start of them that they were going public nor did I ever intend to make them public so therefore no
But it should be a mandate that chats have a disclaimer on them
As I was saying before

I still don’t get your reasoning behind this really.

Behind what?

I dont think making spec chats always public will help you to get more backups. Unless you want to force spec chat to be less enjoyable, so people don’t want to spectate?

How does making spectator chat non-doxxable and less likely to have people flaming in it less enjoyable

I mean the biggest barrier to our Hydra chat being public isn’t that it’s the fact that it’s a Discord PM

if we cared about you knowing that we were flaming your play we wouldn’t have said publicly that we had done so

Actually I would’ve rather known I was flamed than not

And I don’t actually care about you flaming me in your hydra chat

Especially amelia

1 Like

the only thing in Hell and a Cell spec chat was DybuDabu discourse

1 Like

Then dont trashtalk people in first place lmao.

2 Likes

Read through most of this. Dont think specs are as bad of a problem, but that’s tbh cause I spec a lot more than usual cause I am like alt mod or like game manager. I used to only play back up.

In no way shape or form should a spec be added into a game, should be no brainers.

Making things public. I dont mind the 24 hour thing but hosts should be competent enough to know about when game is over for that to also work

As for things being open. Go for it. If people have problems do it invite only method if u really care that much idc. I know I can be harsh sometimes but that’s me. If u got a problem we can talk it out. Theres dms for a reason if it’s something I dont feel comfortable in public with I usually go that method instead and hope they dont get shown

2 Likes

I didnt know everyone here liked gossip and trashtalking so much lol.

Ppl arguing that its unfair for their trashtalking to be shared is hilarious. If ur being a dick about someone and you dont want it known then dont be a dick about them in first place. And if u are a dick about them then they deserve to know anyway.

Snakery level 100

7 Likes

Truth 100

Constructive Criticisim is a thing

which is basically “Nice” trashtalking about somebody lol

Im for Spec chats being public unless there is like only two people Spectating the game, cause thats likely just gonna be dead.

We all have at one point call people in game playing like shit, whats the difference of it being private or not lol

1 Like

And making the chat public at the start gives no excuse to the person if they’re trashtalking them as a person and it goes public.

1 Like