Weizen was the most receptive, but he’s gone now. So who next? Hmmm…
Arguments can definitely be constructive, but in most cases derail themselves due to the lack of rules about them.
I have a few videos that show relatively informal debate, and lack a cohesive structure beyond First person - Second Person | back and forth.
well in critcal thinking
an argument is a conlusion drawn from a set of premises
if it lacks premises/a valid conclusion, it’s a rant
iirc
@Kirefitten
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7mclm9lhI0
Here is one of those types that I mentioned, although the subject content does have much to be desired.
“Don’t mess with coi again”
The concept still applies, humans tend to over analyze things. If you didn’t delete the rules you would have looked over them: the funny part is you would probably see a pattern that doesn’t exist, and I would have said you were on the right track but you aren’t fully there. It’s meant to stall someone and annoy them
