Nominating Gorta is a reasonable excuse, or accusing the other person of being Pixie works.
Nominating Gorta is a reasonable excuse
gorta was already nommed
or accusing the other person of being Pixie works.
fair, but
I’m back
Well, now that basically everyone suspects Atlas of being a Pixie, is there any point for Atlas in trying to convince anyone that he is BH?
the hosts do not decide based on how belived they are
they decide it based on effort
Also Rehab spewed themselves non-Pixie pretty sure by how they just got confused by the role.
So safe to say, both of them are probably not Pixie.
I wonder if the play I should have made is claiming pixie, and allowed Atlas to be BH in belief
that’s the 5head play if I knew the setup
I still think atlas is pixie 100%
Fine. If I hear non-sense, I’m leaving and never accepting another one. /accept
I wonder if the play I should have made is claiming pixie, and allowed Atlas to be BH in belief
IT DOESN’T MATTER HOW BELIEVED THEY ARE
Wouldn’t it be better if… (Nuclear claimed)
Don’t we have… (Poisoner might be in play)
…well, okay.
both poisoner and pit-hag can ruin Nuclear
and well
one of them is guranteed to be in play
so
I don’t want to be ruined
granted, they probably have a crapton of juicy targets
but
That being said.
If they’re both not Pixie.
But both claim Gorta is evil…
Perhaps the real Bounty Hunter was poisoned? And the fake Bounty Hunter is playing into the “yeah it’s Gorta”…
this is for the T/W claims…
Not sure how T/T claims work here
Okay. Fair enough.
The cool part about this is that Poisoner needs to choose between poisoning me, the Lycan or the Bounty Hunter.
Fun
I don’t get why people don’t think at least 1 of them is pixie,
especially the one who claimed the same results after the first one claimed
like is it not obvious?
The way Atlas played this out leads me to believe he’s not Pixie.
And Rehab spewed themselves non-Pixie judging by their reaction pretty sure
Btw, can Drunk think they are a role of another role that is already in the game?