Changes to Occupation

Feedback/Suggestions
#1

I have always felt that there are too many occupy immune classes, reducing how useful Butler and Drunk are. I would like to reduce the number of occupy immune classes, and change some other things.

  1. You will not be notified if your target is occupy immune.
  2. The classes Hunter, Prince, Scorned, and Fool would no longer be occupy immune, and all attempted redirects would function as occupations instead.
  3. Drunk, Butler, Servant, Alcoholic, Poacher, Invoker, Sorcerer, Possessor and King would be the only ones to retain full occupy and redirect immunity.

Notes: I think Mastermind doesn’t need to be immune, since they still get kills and don’t trigger the cool down. The Cult Leader works fine without occupy immunity. Prince would get one time occupy immunity.

#2

But psudo-investigator is the best part of being a butler/drunk!

3 Likes
#3

Drunk still is investigator since he can see if his target is a killer. Butler has defensive abilities that make up for not checking for killers, not to mention the power to confirm himself to King and the power to remove King.

#4

Heres the thing the hunter doesnt live in the castle thats why hes occ immune the butler cant find him

1 Like
#5

Another thing prince is supposed to be strong we dont need to nerf him since if a butler is converted he can stop the prince at any time scorned fool like what i put with hunter they dony live in the castle the fool wants to be exed on the stand the scorned left because of the people who let her husband die

#6

As i have made my point i am against these changes they are there to balance the game

#7

First, the lore is irrelevant. It is the balance that matters. I think Prince is too strong, and this is minor, because it has to happen on a day where he executed to matter.

Also, can you please type in sentences?

2 Likes
#8

Dude hes supposed to be that strong second hunters passive proves he doesnt live in the castle

#9

It doesn’t matter that he doesn’t live in the castle. The game balance is important. The lore is secondary.

3 Likes
#10

I wasnt talking about lore on hunter his littreal passive means he lives alone

#11

Another thing PRINCE HAS TO HE THAT STRONG HES THE GOD DANG JAILOR

#12

It does not matter. I don’t care about the definition of Isolation.

Why does the Prince need to be strong? It’s only a slight nerf if he could be occupied, and all passives that say occupy immune are for balance. They have the names to justify it in the lore.

If you don’t like the idea, prove why it unbalances the game. Don’t make lore based arguments.

1 Like
#13

If the freaking butler gets converted this nerfs prince allot hunters occ immunity is to show that he hunts for a living and he doesnt need anyone but his bear and wolf

#14

That’s a lore argument.

Feels fair game to me. Also the Servant/Invoker would have to know who the Prince is, in which case why not have Assassin/Cult Leader kill him? Also, they would probably only do that if an unseen/cult is jailed, which seems fair game to me. Prince is already has Butler capabilities (with imprison), psychic speak, and 3 use cold steel. Even with this it would still be massively powerful.

2 Likes
#15

Can’t tell if sarcastic or serious

Definitely scared if serious

2 Likes
#16

To who?

#17

Occupation is fine as it is. Case and point. There doesn’t need to change to staple in mafia games

#18

Being fine doesn’t mean it couldn’t be better. Occupation is mostly the same staple in mafia games. It prevents someone’s actions. It also usually stays the same because it works.

Having occupiers not work as pseudo investigators gives evil more claim space, and the fact more classes can be occupied buffs them. I feel this could make the game more fun for both evil and Butler, Drunk, etc.

This isn’t some major thing that would make the game much closer to other mafia games. I see this as a detail.

#19

ffs, OCCUPATION DOESN’T NEED TO BE CHANGED

#21

Even if it isn’t a pressing concern, I think it would make the game better, even if only slightly. If you object, give me a reason why it wouldn’t improve the game or maybe a reason it would make it worse.

If I’m wrong, I’m wrong, but I hate the argument “It’s fine.”