in this case It’s not about the alignment of the person making the case
it’s about what they are putting forward themselves. If a townie isn’t using good logic, their reads are probably not top tier either. Shutting down power willagers is good too.
Differentiating between powerwolves and powerwillagers? im not all that sure on that.
yeah also we should find other methods of improving town play rather than encouraging everyone to do several hour meta reads lol
It’s best to try to see where a person is coming from. This is how i correctly got “braix V” from FoL27. His posts were weird and his logic was poor, but it was possible to understand why he did what he did and thought what he thought.
That’s probably the best way to differentiate between powerwolves and powerwillagers. Try to see if you can understand their mindset and why they think a thing. If there isn’t a string of logic/consistency, no matter how poor, then you probably have detected agenda.
like… he failed my reactiontest. Obviously fucked up his role in a way that shouldn’t seem possible. But his excuse checked out and if you gave him the benefit of the doubt, lots of his plays and logic lined up(even if it was poor)
a scumtell of mine is when I try to get town to try to rely on mechanics over reads in a game
I do it as town sometimes when it’s obvious you can, however its pretty easy to tell if I’m pushing an agenda with mechanics
i make no sense as town or scum so my powerwolfagering and power wolfing are hard to tell a part
i read you correctly in FoL27 because you did a few similar meta tells
but im not sure if that will work in the future
