Put your vote on me so o can chop someone’s head off
Marl, you know what to do too with your vote, right?
That way it won’t be a vamp gets it at all
In a stag hunt, betraying gives a worse outcome only if most other people betray.
If few (but not 0) people betray, betraying leads to a better outcome, which is also true for this game.
the fewer people betray, the better off you are by doing so yourself.
If people like it, then possibly. I"m going to wait til the game ends and the general reaction toward it to make a decision.
Just think the main problem is
If no one betrays. I think there has to be atleast one starting witch?
Look at it this way: If nobody betrays, at least the “game” is over quickly. 
Also, I feel like many people are misinterpreting a rule.
A vampire may become Chief IF that vampire is also a commoner.
Chief, vampire, and werewolf are statuses that stack on top of your faction. (witch, commoner, clergy) None of these statuses are mutually exclusive, the way that factions are.
1 Like
Nope! They can work together temporarily, but ultimately witches must fight to the death.
That’s why individual witches are so much more powerful than individual clergymen. The clergy is working together; the witches only do so when convenient.
Oh.
The one thing that made me laugh in the description was the commoner like
They are a bit miffed about the holy war BS happening
2 Likes
I apologize if this wasn’t clear from the description, but I feel like I need to add some clarity to the vampire section.
common folk vampires do NOT generate mana during the day.
and when a vampire siphons mana, he steals the mana of his target. The mana siphoned doesn’t just… vanish.
