so then why did you say they were wolfy before they made that reaction
An additional note on this. I was going through some posts from D1 while looking into Wazza, and I got to the point where there was a big argument between Alice and Marshal. Alice was accusing Marshal of rolefishing. Now, it seems like Alice might have been overreacting a bit, and I probably would normally dismiss this. But coupled with the stuff about my night action reveal, I do wonder if Alice picked up on something valid there.
Because the post
Reacting to my graph was overblown and pinged me as scummy judging I didnāt have a lot of influence in thread and hadnāt voted them yet
(which I replied to)
(With my vote)
that is my point
you had no reason for suspecting them until after you pushed them bc ur read was fake
I wouldnāt have actually voted them if they hadnāt said the things I quoted in my post
itās gut arctic
gut reads arent gut anymore if you have posts
You can have a gut read on a post
Or you can have a generally gut read thatās just āthis person feels kinda weirdā
I could go through the iso and try to find them but thatād be explaining my read after I already made it, which is wolfy ):
3 Likes
You canāt just say someone makes you feel weird without having posts that make you feel that way
do you remember Sulit as Scientist giving thorough explanations for their reads though
they at least gave some reason to scumread someone before they decided they were a wolf
here they said they scumread someone and gave posts said person created after sulit already decided they were a wolf
I decided they were a wolf after the posts
I thought they were kinda sus before the posts
idk i donāt think itās any weirder than how in multiple games, sulit said i was wolfing on D1 and didnāt give an explanation
and they were town in all of those
