Yeah… it kinda has hints of “Oh, Wazza’s an imploding villager so better stay off-wagon so the fallout doesn’t hit me” which is what I’ve seen of his wolfgame irt wolfy villagers.
in FAM vulgard was just a bunch of takes lthat i thought “oh this is wolfy this is wolfy and that over there is wolfy too” while i was ignoring the villagery stuff
your entire shtick this game has been riddled with gimmicks; you should be conscious of this, the way you used your puppet is transparently gimmicky. but that’s fine, I’m cool with using puppets in a gimmicky way, I’ve done that before.
but take the Wazza push. it’s not that it’s not reasonably complex or nuanced, because no matter what your pushes are complex. it’s just, instead of pinpointing a fundamental flaw in Wazza (I would personally point to the big issue being not the GM issue but rather the complete self-awareness of how antagonistic she’s being and the complete lack of any even slight effort to cease being combative with a group of people she supposedly believes to be mostly fellow villagers) you instead point to the kitsch trappings of that; you’re acting like the GM thing is the fundamental reason why Wazza can’t be v instead of merely the most obvious symptom of the problem
and that troubles me, because it’s gimmicky. it’s like instead of what I’d consider your usual move, to isolate some fundamental deficiency in how somebody is playing and utterly tear into it, you’re instead going after things which are still significant and then driving them into a case. that’s how I read people, sure. but I don’t think that’s how you do it.
i dont believe in this authoritarian regime of “me being expected to present my reads”
i call for a REVOLUTION to bring us back to the ROOTS of FoL townplay