Idk why bd inqs exist but they’re annoying as hell
I mean inq is majorly flawed for other reasons, which do make removing it not unreasonable
But since “muh neutral variety”, would probs be best to have uninformed heretics unless a better solution arises
Which is why it’s a problem. Since inq is anti-BD it shouldn’t be able to side BD, yet it does.
IMO I’d rather have 3 good neutrals than 3 good and 1 broken neutral. Also, they could just replace it. For example, bring Pretender back but rework it so it works similar to Inq(Checking if someone has Royal Blood)
what I’m getting from “bring pret back but rework it”
is “add Chancellor”
This is a neut I unironically would love to see in ToL
you see
pretender should clearly be those neutral killers that get more powerful when they’re King
1 Like
A NK that has anti-king/election abilities and becomes more powerful as king would be interesting. Not sure how you’d balance it though. You’d have to make the normal one weak enough that you want to be king, but not weak enough that you would die instantly.
I don’t think it’s gambler’s fallacy if Fool is second Neutral, since a third neutral is not guaranteed.
I like Seeker, it gives you a ton of info. Both observer abilities in one. You can figure out support classes from that and if someone is Prince or Hunter.
It’s too hard to disguise as Scorned. If it were up to me, disguise would remain on a target until you disguised someone else. You can’t disguise an imprisoned target even though sometimes that’s when you’re most certain they will be executed the next day.
And disguise should be infinite use.