this is fair, but both of these games are 100% identical to previously successful setups, so they require exactly 0 review.
well Virtuous III will have some slight tweaks for consistency and to fix classcard text errors
but that’s it
well, I wasn’t around for RM3, but it’s possible there were balance issues in that game that a reviewer would want to correct, or at least to look at
Side note: I was somehow forcibly logged out and had to log in again about 15 minutes ago here
Even though that’s never happened to me before, like ever.
You really don’t need to be making this a problem. People don’t want to play the same setup over and over again and you haven’t actually made a new setup as far as I am aware. Sometimes we make the decision to keep forum games fresh to run games that are new and haven’t been played here before.
1 Like
I forgot about this, and that’s okay
But if this is the case, please keep things updated in the queue
That’s what I care about most
If my stuff needs to be removed or demoted in the queue; that’s fine
Please just tell me and most of all, keep the queue updated, though
The queue is more about having a list of who wants to host than a set defined order of who hosts next. Don’t get me wrong it is an order of such but we need to make decisions to make sure people aren’t getting bored.
1 Like
And I see that and I’m totally fine with that now
However, I’m a lot more likely to be incentivized to create new setups if I’m being told the ones I have in there must be removed for freshness’s sake.
So yeah, please tell me if my rehashes are getting removed.
Can I be notified at least a week in advance of when you’ll want me to open signups or something
If so, I’m good.
If you want to create a new setup, do it.
But don’t force yourself to do something you dont want