Corrupt Votes - Spectator Chat

Town could theoretically win at parity with the buy votes thing.

Yeah, but I won’t allow that to happen. To much of a bother to do.

But but but, don’t you want your game to stand out for being the game that town wins? Make it happen by allowing the buy votes thing to happen during parity!

Not really no. Whether town wins or loses should never depend on the host.

The outcome will depend on the host if you make the game end at parity when town could have won using a feature the game has. Parity is usually used for games that don’t have any way for town to win at parity.

Yep. It’s an “if”, which has nothing to do with me.

Yes, it would be nice for town “if” that was the case.
But it isn’t.

I TR Arete and SR Cloned now.

I also SR Alice b/c they’re prob one of the following:

  1. Scum
  2. Scum-Siding Neut

I TR Eli and SR PKR

Pigeon, youve gotta explain some of these abbreviations to me because im like a newborn to all of this stuff, trying to figure out like some of them mean is like trying to decipher some sort of code.

SR = Scumread (I think they’re mafia)
TR = Townread (I think they’re town)

PKR = PokemonKidRyan

sick, ty!!

Surge is so obviously town.

I’m actively nulling Light and Leafia for now. Everyone else hasn’t really posted so they’re technically null.

/vote PKR, good wagon, I’d prefer wagoning Alice, but others prob don’t want it.

@Zone_Q11 If a tie is reached, will the neut be the only person to die?

No? Did you read the OP at all?

In that case, I think PKR is scum and should not tie.

Quick popin to say that arete is incredibly obvious wolf bye now!