solar flare from pvz heroes
Accused | Voters | Count |
---|---|---|
Leafia | Solic, Centuries, min, AtNoName | 4/13 |
clonedcheese | TrustworthyLiberal, astand, EliThePsycho | 3/13 |
TrustworthyLiberal | Mistyx | 1/13 |
Vulgard | sculptordwarf | 1/13 |
Mistyx | clonedcheese | 1/13 |
Centuries | Leafia | 1/13 |
Not voted | Vulgard, Ami, Dota, PKR, Light, WindwardAway, ArcticXI, Majora, an_gorta_pratai, Eevee, rat, KyoDaz, YouButWorse | 13 |
Heyo dota.
Busy with Uni stuff, gaming when I have the time.
Atm doing some housework for wolfy and watching to expose any contradictions.
nice pick
is pvz heroes good? or is it riddled with microtransactions like pvz 2
for some reason her fanart is incredibly cursed, iāve seen a lot of weird shit while searching for the avi
pvz heroes is pretty good, kind of like hearthstone so you can play it without using money but itās still kind of pay to win
you can pay to win or you can be me and win with the most BS RNG deck possible
(i main solar flare)
ok past 1 hour catchup post real quick
light wallpost
lots of the points are just either, either hella hedgy or just stating w leaning reads on people, even the v reads are very hedgy, I also struggle to see him as someone who comes into thread and just says he kinda thinks everyone is semi scummy, doesnt feel like heās trying to solve peopleās alignment and heās just putting w reads for the sake of it, its not 'w reads" its more so, pointing things that make people look worse but it doesnt come off to me as him just, trying to find town basically
vs the single read that truly comes off as faithful
gortaās catchup post is so small and like, he just doesnāt do anything
if this is softing, go ahead but like, itās kinda what happens every game in between us for some reason
also like im quoting this but, thereās really nothing which isnāt like, unusual for gorta (i mean usually he at least has content) but this is very barebones catchup wise
Leafia does this thing where, I donāt know what it means for her alignment (Leafiaās, not Kyoās here) but basically, she will attach herself to whoever trās her and it really comes off to me as veryyy not pro-town and maybe even scummy? Like I didnāt plan on trying to have a sensible argument with Leafia coming into this game but this is very āhe called me a w read so i wont engage with him and ill just shade him 24/7 while calling him out for shading me and i will attach myself to whoever trs meā which is what she did last game
uh basically
im not shading you
i think youāre scum still, for real, not shading, im expressing my read
also this point is very bad and like, i think makes cheese look worse, in the past, i wouldve said this was a better look for cheese (as leafia says herself, she will buss a lot, but having seen her last scumgame she will sometimes just hard v read scummates and in a not (at all) discrete way) which basically, she kinda did the same thing in enemy within 3 with seth so like, i think it makes cheese look kinda worse i imagine)
I kinda changed my thoughts halfway through into my Leafia point
uh you could apply what i said about cheese to kyo
but i dont think its as likely for it to be w/w (i dont want to be doing associative reads but here we are)
Centuries, consider the following: those were observances <600 posts in. Iām merely stating what I saw.
Why did you already have a formed opinion? Could you truly have been so confident in a read?
Also, the irony of hedging in a post about hedging.
anything going on rn
lightās readspost being hedgy doesnāt concern me tbh
Well I still find it odd your observations are 90% negative leaning ones meanwhile you have 1 clear V read out of 600 posts and around 15 or so observations
The thing you think is weird about the Eli readlist is the fact it was made with random org instead of it being forced? What? How is your read made then
My first draft of this post completely ignored Kyoās alignment meanwhile I went on a tangent about what Leafiaās post meant for Cheeseās alignment if my read on Leafia is correct
?_?
Itās not me being hedgy
I never come up with a positive outtake of this post
My original take was that your observations were read which isnāt factual so I explained that your post technically barely had any reads in it
Also you not voicing out a w read on me when you probably think that Iām W from your pov at least, seeing what you said about my posts
is kinda
weirdchamp
itās moreso the content thats problematic imo
Rat has indeed bombed their calculus but oh well
Going to catch up now
respect
solar flare GOAT
actually found yet another poggers tell for someone i play often with
pog