PKR’s kill was performed differently, however, and I intend to find out why.
so CRich was a general projectile kill while PKR was a weird close range projectile kill
That would appear to be the case, but I can’t think of a reason why the killer would end up lacerating PKR instead of piercing him.
Well, they had to pierce his skin to lacerate him, but I don’t think that’s what you mean.
You know what I mean. Logic dictates that he should have stab wounds if the killer submitted /throw kunai at PKR, yet instead the kunai lacerated him and embedded themselves very deeply in the wall, making cut wounds. Something is going on there.
This means the killer specifically wanted to do those actions while for the kill on CRich, they just did /throw kunai at CRich
That’s what I think happened, yes. I just can’t think why they’d do it like that for any other reason.
If they wanted us to think the kill was done at melee, they would have removed the kunai from the walls. And even then, why would they want us to think that? Knowing how the kill was performed is helpful, but it seems nowhere near good enough to want to decrease your chances of success to obfuscate it.
Therefore, there has to be some kind of strange circumstance that would make the killer throw the kunai like that. And if we can figure out that, the mystery of this case should unravel.
