My case does not rest around one point. It’s not the only information? I think more of you, light, there’s so much more than the blanket. The conflicting information is what thunderdomes us, but there’s way more than that!
Like, there’s her reaction to everything, she’s constantly ignored logic and hammered home this one point. There are so many things that should give you pause that I;m the blackened, and the “fingerprint” is one thing, literally one thing from 1 person and it’s something that could easily be bypassed.
Like
Please take a look at all of it.
Walk me through why you disagree with my approach. What do you think I, socially, do differently here as spotless?
I wholeheartedly disagree with your point on me being “similar to the exe game”, in that one I ignored logic and pushed alice on a faulty basis and shut down every explination. Here I’ve put my heart and soul out here and given all I have, all of it, to try to prove my innocence.
I want to know what you think I would do “differently”.
And I *want you to gather all of the information on the case, look at ALL OF IT, and then come to a decision. Focusing on just the blanket is really dumb when there’s so much more information to the game. I don’t want to berate you, it’s possible your mind is just set on the blanket thing and thinking the whole case revolves around that when it doesn’t, and it’s a cup of evidence in a sea of information.
Promise me light, for me, that you will at least try to look at things holistically.