Debate: Terrorist or Revolutionary?

Off-Topic (Thronepass)
#21

and Treaty of Versailles

#22

that was WW1 my friend

but yes

#23

Honestly how cool would it be if someone wrote a thread on the predictions of what would happened if events didn’t happen as they did, aka someone lost a war they were suppose to win

#24

agreeing with you on the point victors write the history books

#25

Revolutionary acts could be considered terrorism though if the revolutionaries lost.

#26

That was my point

#27

luxy in the time leading up to survivor dropping i get very excited mkay

#28

Which survivor is that one?

#29

USSurvivor

#30

Aus survivor just finished

#31

yeah it was amazing as usual.

#32

But the intention of the tar and feathering at the time wasn’t for the purpose of creating a revolution but it was more for a protest against taxes. A violent protest one may say. Which harmed British citizens, who were just following orders, they killed a pawn in a larger scheme just to express their point of view. Do you still think it is patriotism or do you think it is terrorism?

#33

Its david vs goliath isnt it?

#34

USSurvior is DvG yeah

#35

Respond to me my dude

#36

I’ve seen the first ep already.

But they stopped showing it on tv here :frowning:

#37

RIP. I’ll try to find a link.

#38

Sent a link to you in DM

#39

Both terrorists and revolutionaries are the same thing. They are mere reflections of the same word catalouged by long after critics. Critics will always remain biased towards the viewpoint their country supports or that they themselves support. If you look from the British side, they were terrorists. If you look from the English side, revolutionaries. It’s biased to call them either, so you must call them none.

2 Likes
#40

wait but
some people are, like, terrorists terrorists
i understand your point but