im not following your logic on this one
you want to exe evils but do not care about using solid reasoning and instead will use whatever reasoning comes to mind, whether it is a correct line of reasoning or not?
im not following your logic on this one
you want to exe evils but do not care about using solid reasoning and instead will use whatever reasoning comes to mind, whether it is a correct line of reasoning or not?
if you don’t correctly scumhunt you are less likely to lynch scum period
I will use whatever reasoning worked best in my past 3000 games. Yes.
see this is why playing Prince is great
I can just exe all the obvious evils myself, and all the protectives will sit on me so I don’t get SPK’d
ok the conversation has shifted from “is 3 of the same being a reason for exing fallacious” and it has been concluded as so.
to “is it bad to use fallacious reasoning”
Just cuz your reasoning is bad, doesnt turn your target player into BD
even a not so smart player will be killed for being prince
saying that fallacious reasoning is bad simply for being fallacious is a fallacy of it’s own though
yeah but saying fallacious reasoning isn’t good is… common sense
It works therefore its a good reason
But see protectives understand that protecting the Prince = good
It doesn’t always work.
does it tho?
i wish we had stats for how often a group of 3 maids/sherrifs/chronoes/physes spawned.
much rarer than 3 chronos/physicians/sheriffs
You are wrong here
We dont push on ALL 3spawners
Just on the suspicious claims.
yes but pushing them because 2 other independant people claimed that class is fallacious
just because A and B claimed maid does not change the likelyhood of C being maid or not
and so you can push C for being suspicious
but not for being 3rd maid
Ok to put it in maths:
The odds that a specific 3claim Maid is evil arent higher
But the odds that ONE OF THEM is evil are much higher
how much higher is 3 chrono claims being evil vs 2 chrono claims and a phys claim
Healers are independent from each other