(Not as cool as my non-fake sword :^) )
Ashes and molten gold.
Still hot ashes if you checked them.
I couldn’t even touch them myself.
Now let’s think for a moment.
Arctic’s plane showed us ghost near monument.
And we know there was a ritual or some other weird action performed near obelisk.
And yet we have apprentice telling us it was invisibility ritual.}
I see certain other option here, don’t you?
(so what i think you’re saying is that there’s a possibility app lied or is simply wrong about the ghost representing the invisibility ritual?)
I will remind you.
That’s how I began the case.
Can you tell me when did you learn Derps is the culprit and started trying to find evidence for that?
Right away, due to what Apprentice said.
And who delivered clothes and said where they apparently come from?
And who is giving information about rituals?
All information prosecution in this case works on comes from… one person.
And since the very beginning people inspected Derps, his room, checked how his sword matches the marks…
Did a lot of stuff, some of them even irrelevant, like the sword ones.
My point right now is that you did not try to find a guilty person, but you did try to find evidence against Derps instead.
See a bit of difference?
1 Like
So dear Jury, I’m presenting you a holes.
And I’m presenting you omitted evidence.
I’m also pointing out that this case is standing on one witness.
This is not as simple case as you might think.
And jumping to conclusion won’t help. Which obviously happened here, since the very begining of investiagtion.
Not even trial, but investigation itself.