Well Amelia did say they voted on Jane Ch3, which makes me think they’re probably not MM here and their vote lines with the other Jane voters who are all confirmed not MM.
the person didn’t really matter that much since the plan was under the impression that it kinda just teleported people
when i realized that wasnt the case i didn’t realllly care to use it in a murder anymore
meh
i don’t want to tinfoil it?
yeah, i think it’s unlikely MM would claim to have voted jane before others even gave their vote
the fact it was before others claimed their vote is important, because in the end they could have voted trochi and still claimed to have voted jane
See, my take on this is that, given the revelation that the Inverted Castle can appear at different times in different iterations, we were already not clearing Wilfred for having died in 1314-A, so it cost nothing for Timoleon to not mention exactly when the Inverted Castle appeared in iteration 1314, and therefore doing so likely had a purpose, that being that it did in fact amount to a clear on Wilfred.
(Also, I kinda like to think that hosts hadn’t entirely thought through the idea of using the Inverted Library info against the Hall of Failures letters to try and get MM clears, and they mostly squelched it because of that fact, but they gave us something for being clever.)
(Of course, I have a nasty mentality of “metareading hosts is a totally ethical thing to do in games like this, but since they’re aware that you’re trying to metaread them, they’re of course free to try and obfuscate metareads on them on purpose”, and that’s not wildly common around here, so maybe take my approach with a grain of salt.)
…no
this was when we thought having a backstory = being lorecleared because it was in chapter 2
One of the warnings we got told us not to clear someone as not MM just because they had a past life.
Refer to warning on run 1827.
yes crich
i am aware
that’s why i’m trying to look for weird reactions to being fake lorecleared
it was all one big roof
it had ten boxes
its where i found that essay i showed you as a monkey, and the flash drive
i have a list of the items somewhere, 1sec
in the reverse library i showed an essay and then left shortly before unmonkeying myself
i can prob find that too?
holy shit
there’s so much unanswered stuff
the drawing room puzzle
the words we got from the theatre
a bunch of other puzzles i probably don’t know about
the town square mosaic thing
who the hell james willoughby is / who the hell the person controlling the shadows was
(this one isn’t really relevant to the lore but i still want to know what the blue ink from TL’s case did)
whatever we were meant to do with the reward hall
Summary
1st box had a clown nose, a clown costume, and a set of clown makeup
2nd box had a powerful electromagnet
3rd box had a plastic bag filled with Googly eyes, a tube of Superglue, and a set of Allen wrenches
4th box had a stuffed dog, the front right leg of which has been replaced with a tentacle
5th box had an essay
6th box had 4 bottles of gatorade
7th box had a Swiss Army Knife, a piece of swiss cheese, a Swiss Franc, and a Swiss Rolex watch
8th boxhad a grey rock
9th box had a box of matches, a wind-up music box that plays the Puella Magi Madoka Magica theme, a single candlestick, a coffee mug with Nicolas Cage’s face, a pack of empty rubber balloons, and a long spool of fishing line
10th box had packing peanuts and a flash drive
Who is Truly Irredeemable?
By Lilian Townsend
Editor’s Note: This essay was the winner of the ████ Royal Institute Philosophy Essay Prize.
Who is truly irredeemable? This question has plagued humanity from the moment man first took another man’s life in anger. Some philosophers have argued that there is some level of moral failure beyond which one’s life becomes worthless and one’s actions become incapable of demonstrating goodness. This view is particularly popular among virtue ethicists[1].
Yet this approach fails in light of a consequentialist approach to ethics. Are all the most heinous crimes – murder, assault, kidnapping – indeed serious? Of course. Yet if a murderer pulls a drowning child out of a lake, that child’s life is saved, as surely as if it had been Jesus himself pulling them out.
By focusing more greatly on
the essay looks like it goes into a new page, but no pages were present
there was no puzzles in there
but i also checked after i melted the spoon