Opener: NAI. Shows initiative for thread control - indicative of CRich being themselves
Classifying people early on - also seems natural
I would like a little more on this take however
Although tgis is flawed, strongly taking a stance feels natural
Fyi bad argument because nost groupscum are too lazy to go ask that in their chat unless it’s really telling
Gives you a tiny bit of towncred too
At least i am when im groupscum
Id like to see this develop over the game
At this time i think centuries is a good enough player to be same as both alignments
Consistent with town meta - going one by one and reading them, even if it’s really early in the game
Again more early definitions - normal if not towny of crich
Paranoia of being ML kicks in to send massive red flags from this, but at least classifying me as scummy seems ok ish. I have no idea where they’re talking about “states the obvious” tho. Would usually hard scumread for this, but since the same thing happened in FoL 28 (where i was ss), i think they’re likely town here
Ash arc:
Problematic statement was
I say this is normal thing for a town to say
But then:
W h o a
I say this is a bold accusation
CRich responds with:
Now that’s what i call defensive
Quite an overreaction to 1 person voting
first I appreciate their commitment to “jettison”
but this feels incredibly overreactiony
like
why
ash didn’t even push CRich that hard, they were just like “wow this seems weird”
not very different from their own occasional pushes
…do I sense a deathtunnel
openwolfing d1
goodie
…yup this is a deathtunnel
i don’t see why that post is wolfy in particular
and they don’t explain it
w hat
And then:
Wow.
I quoted almost every post here up until that point
like Wow.
Ok someone needs to chill
like
Light wasn’t involved
This is the most descriptive post as to why they are accusing Ash and Mist to be openwolfing. 1) the argument is flawed, but 2) that was extremely firey
This is what I’m talking about in “flawed”
It’s extremely towny to switch opinions fast based on transpiring events
Conclusion:
At the very least CRich’s argument is flawed. A quick change of opinion is indicative of towniness. Additionally one does not need to interact with another player to be able to call them out as scummy.
From their extremely defensive reaction to a light push, I think they might be trying to intimidate the other side into backing down. Not the best strategy, in terms of game enjoyability
If I’m not mistaken, this happened when Ans bussed CRich during SFoL 61.5
Do you realize that if we remove people from the elim pool for being useless and not doing anything because it “doesn’t spew anything” this actively encourages scum to be useless, not do anything, and therefore give us zero spew.
Did you even read why I scum read Ash in the first place?
He town read me and then scum read me.
Though I’m starting to think he might be a townie here.
Seriously, we aren’t close to it. Why are you just being like ‘I don’t want there to be so many wagons at the end’. You can look at FoL 28, that didn’t hurt us at all with multiple wagons as people will eventually move onto one wagon. Not to mention we have plurality that physically can not be removed according to the OP. No matter what, people will have to decide a wagon, so you being scared of this is annoying me and is what would make Town lose, you’re focusing on the end too much.