It’s 100% in Town’s interest to kill Derps.
ok but you don’t have evidence I’m ne either
Derps being executed is the safe move.
Lynching someone else is the unsafe move but can grant enough info to suffice.
dunno. primarily I believe a neut we find acting anti town is better off dying at night compared to being exed
Derps. I don’t think anyone wants to speak to you. Eevee was the player calling min confirmed Town.
Also, if I may ask, if min was Sellsword as you are very clearly claiming.
Why wouldn’t they use Stonewall?
Not horribly against it tho
Eevee will make an attempt to talk something out with me not responding to any of y’all anymore because theirs no point
Uhuh. Just suddenly disappear when your logic is very clearly flawed.
You’re just yelling at me theirs no point in talking to any of you
I’ve asked you 2 questions which break your entire argument and you just ignored them.
This is just WIFOM
No way to answer them
so wait does ne win while dead
No no, I’m serious.
Why wouldn’t they use Stonewall? Like ever. They can only use it the first two nights and taking a gamble that can win them the game is a lot better than not doing so.
Also how are they Chancellor that can debauch?
How am I Cult Leader that death-pushed on Marl despite being able to move the wagon from them multiple times?
What was my old Cult Role if I am the Cult Leader now?
I have something to say if they do
Depends.
BD need them dead.
Sellsword just needs BD dead.
Fool just needs no more than 1 member of the Unseen or Cult killed.
Chancellor needs to survive with BD losing or have 3 BD are executed.
If they join Unseen/Cult chat then they can win even dead.
If I was ss, I wouldn’t be defending myself this much
as I can win while dead
With only 1 Cult Alive?
I think you would.
shrug
not really, especially if cult is being wagoned. I always die before cult as ss and I make sure of it