Evil king is way too strong now

[Frostwolf103]

@Floofyboy

Its a very stupid rule. I think they added it to counter “salty unseen” that outted their partner as a way to game throw, but your removing a very big part of mafia/werewolf games.

Then don’t play around me? Stop wasting time what’s right and wrong.

[Floofyboy]

@Frostwolf103

@Floofyboy

Its a very stupid rule. I think they added it to counter “salty unseen” that outted their partner as a way to game throw, but your removing a very big part of mafia/werewolf games.

Then don’t play around me? Stop wasting time what’s right and wrong.

I don’t understand your post?

[RopeStringFace]

@Floofyboy

Be carefull tho. Rating out your evil partners is a bannable offense whitout their consent. If you find out someone is evil with your report, you have to first get their consent before bussing.

I doubt it applies to king. It only says if you CAN tell them before hand, and whisping them before accusing them would be susp.

@Floofyboy

When its a evil king, there can be less neutrals more BD, the existing neutrals can be more good like alchemist or mercs.

When its a good king, the opposite happens. More neutrals less BD. Neutral roles are more evil (fool scorned). There can also be less investigative roles like sheriff/paladin

Of course, none of this should be set in stone. We shouldn’t be able to deduct anything from this.

once all the neutrals are dead, BD would be able to deduce king’s alignment…

My suggestion is instead a neutral class that spawns if there is a good/evil king that sides with the opposite of the original king’s goal. It would not know it’s alignment until the original king died.