[FM] 2d3 II - Title Game - Mafia Concedes

The Good King :shield: :crossed_swords:
Blue Dragon Special

Head of State (Passive) - Your vote counts as two. You are immune to occupation and redirection. When you die a vote will be held to determine the next king. If you are lynched, all members of the Blue Dragon will lose their Royal Blood passive. Disable this passive when there are less than 5 players alive.

Royal Pardon (Day) - Make a player unable to be voted today. This will be announced. - 2 Uses

Guards! (Night) - Send a guard to a player to protect them. They will be immune to death. This cannot target the same player on consecutive nights. - Infinite Uses
Swear Fealty (Night) - Make a player permanently immune to conversion. - 1 Use

BD wincon

Dunno why I have this copied tbh

I II III
- - -
- - -
X - -

I wasnt defending myself though. That entire thing was how he shouldnt trust me from that little. it was more like getting him to better himself. The purpose of the first part of that post was not to make myself seem more town at all, just explaining how i think he should do things, along with a brief explanation why i didnt think it alone was worth voting him over. I.e. if he hadnt made the post the first bit was referring to, but still had the second, i would have just posted the same amount and voting him.

I dont like sit down and actively make reads on people. thats just not how i do it. i process what information ive seen on them, and compress that down into a rough probability estimate as to their alignment. and that can (and usually does) take a good bit of time.

but i was though. regardless of how effective it was, that was my purpose. putting some things out there and making it easier to have a discussion. Yeah it was bad, and probably the wrong thing to do, however it remains unchanged that at its core that was my purpose in doing that.

Uhh

My brain machine broke because forgot how defending self works

I guess that could be the case, but none of the things you did say actually had a real point behind them, which I guess you could construe as your attempts to get discussion going?

It makes some sense looking back at it I think

Just trust me.
Getting your hands dirty is super helpful.

Well, christ.

Thereā€™s not really much I can add to a redcheck on Ici and Geydeā€™s longposting.

1 Like

Not much except for my vote, mind you.

/vote Icibalus

:smile: I really want to argue w/ people

Like, the hell do I do here?

Gameā€™s solved, itā€™s a thunderdome between Simon and Ici. :man_shrugging:

I didnā€™t even get any time to put forward any analysis to make myself a title candidate

Also my shitty confirmation bias is acting up again :confused:

Nobody really played especially standout good to get MVP

Like overall Town did good and didnā€™t tunnel each other

And Simon doesnā€™t count

Honestly?

I need to check wagons first, but I think I might know who gets it.

Iā€™d like to hear your thoughts there

Ech, nevermind.

I honestly thought it mightā€™ve gone to Hjasik but he didnā€™t actually vote Magnus until a fair few others did

But he did very much show himself as town and inquired a lot

He actually sort of got Ici.

Thatā€™s why they got nkā€™d

I gotta hand it to Hjasik

Heā€™s definitely improving from his days in Expansionist

(Which, by the way, is an awful game we donā€™t talk about)

1 Like