I think my impression from cloned’s post is that I’m not convinced that it was villagery solving.
Aside from commenting on several shots without conclusion (why?), I feel the ratio of description of events to actually analyzing them falls on lower side.
As well as the feeling he picked rather small and strange reasons for the conclusions he did reach.
Why did you decide to approach the analysis in the exact manner you did, commenting on every shot made without regard to usefulness?