Did I miss anything
Okay, let’s start from meta actually.
This will be simpler explanation.
If you asked anyone about what’s my playstyle, they will say that a lot of fpsing and gambits.
That’s half true.
My playstyle is focusing on support/defensive type (using St.Petersburg university classification), rather than scumhunting.
There are easily games where I didn’t scumhunt whole game as a town.
How does it connect?
You see, I play mafia for double digit number of years by now.
And tbh… scumhunting is repetitive. It’s a lot about analysis till you have enough of it.
There is many other styles.
In my case? I like to bait scumi nto incorrect decisons and support town in making correct ones.
I don’t scumhunt most of the games.
FPSing is more visible way of making scum perform suboptimaly.
Gambits? Same, help refine reads, situation and make scum more exposed in most situations.
Why do I do it?
Causae it’s way more fullfilling when you trick scum when they are supposed to trick you.
If I have to do reads on my own I use on of defensive styles.
Aka read peolpe on how they aproach you, rather than agressively aproach them.
Like look at me “defending” Nuclear.
I’m focusing on staying away from main push and trying to point out possible problems, while also trying to convince Nuclear to finaly cooperate.
Mediate betwen them, I would say.
Me creating thread pressure to finaly do something, when thread was mostly fluffing is actually natural.
The way to discern it is exactly motivation.
Here I did it when people were discussing… games I think?
I’m not sure I explained this understandable enough without going into game theory, tho it’s 6 am and I didnt sleep yet.
As this part.
I actually took more active people, and pretty likely less likely to be manipulated.
(Sorry Squid)
That’s also what I was trying student council to do.
To lead and unite people.
After all, they are supposed to be people who are most trustworthy and thats why they were elected, right?
Sorry for lack of responses and no LastDay eval
Internet on this drive is WAY worse than I thought
We are leading people (e.g. the Nuclear push)
tell em arete
i am too tired and… checked out right now for reasons but you go right at em.
Actually, belivable lies are simple, this one is complicated.
You should ask Firekitten or Icibalus more about it I guess if you want another source.
But that alone should change your PoV on how I approach games when in support style.
If you have any questions about my actions after I explained my general motivation, I’m open.
Ici is also on the ‘Eevee scum’ side of the debate
I’m not saying to ask him about reads, but about multiple playstyles theorem.
i dont agree with the push on you but i do on nuke.
not really gonna fight it because i can barley type this out cohesively. But i support arete at least giving some interactions with you that are solery missed
Meh, I disliked Nuke trying to hide behind me with all this “eevee can confirm me” “eevee can defend me”, when I really don’t think I could.
Not me to judge it tho.
Non-Stop Debate:
Accused | Voters | Number |
---|---|---|
PoisonedSquid | Kai_5, Emilia | 2 |
Limestone | Solic, Hippolytus, Marshal, Mercenary | 4 |
Nuclear_Rehab | Arete, PoisonedSquid, orangeandblack5 | 4 |
Arete | Shurian | 1 |
Solic | Insanity | 1 |
orangeandblack5 | DatBird | 1 |
Scrum Debate:
Verdict | Voters | Number |
---|---|---|
eevee is a culprit | 0 | |
eevee is innocent | 0 | |
Not voting | Luxy, Arete, WazzaAzza, Icibalus, Universal, SirDerpsAlot, Nuclear_Rehab, Lastday | 8 |
Argument Armament:
Accused | Voters | Number |
---|---|---|
Emilia | Hippolytus, Marshal, Arete, Solic, PoisonedSquid, orangeandblack5, DatBird, Shurian | 9 |
Kai_5 | 0 |
Sooo before I Forget:
/Vote Emilia in Argument Armamant
Guess there’s no way Kai dies here anyway. Though it’s Kind of weird that Kai and Emilia are Voting together.
i don’t like squid at all
she hasn’t done anything towny plus from how her wagon for Historian feels like it was scum-backed due to there being no counter wagon