[FM] Danganronpa FM [Canned]

[Italy]

Welp, goodbye eevee.

[eevee]

Im anticlaim immune, no worries.

[eevee]

Thats due to other ability.

I won’t out it for now tho.

[TrustworthyLiberal]

Am off early also Eevee the resended the neighborhood claim to my knowledge

[Marshal]

@eevee-sama

I also think it would be good to have one neigborhood member in council, so Marshal in (or Derps and… Kai was it?) Would be good to passing info around.

this was a joint reactiontest that me and derps did thinking the other one was the one wanting to reactiontest

[TrustworthyLiberal]

That is fair enough

[eevee]

@Marshal

this was a joint reactiontest that me and derps did thinking the other one was the one wanting to reactiontest

So we cantlink join 3 chats?

Ehhb… fair enough

[TrustworthyLiberal]

Did you ever post what you got out of it btw cause that could be usefull

[Marshal]

I did somewhere

it wasn’t that much as i didn’t initiate it(or so i thought) but ill quote it for you

[Solic]

I see you’re conveniently not having any of your posts here.

@Mercenary

You mean, you can’t come up with a convincing argument, so you resort to just calling me scum and leaving it at that

I did not do that. I made all my reasons explicit, and you just cherrypicked some to distort my words on them That’s strawmanning.

This is misrepresenting my point. I had already countered your points and you were like “eff it, I’m out” and I then proceeded to show that as you not having a case, because you couldn’t counter my counter.

@Solic

You are being wolfread because of your overly aggressive jumpy behavior

Point me to a town game where I’m not “overly aggressive”.

Mercenary:

and according Ici you also don’t discuss your reads but just point them out.

Oh, so according to Ici, but not according to you then?

Mercenary:

Whoever on the Ici wagon that is not Hja

You’ve such a good grasp on the situation that you can’t even name them.

All these points you didn’t address, you were just like:

@Mercenary

…you know what?
Why am I discussing? I’m not convincing you that you are a wolf and won’t fall for your fallacies.

Next one!

@Mercenary

because no reasons.

I have plenty of reasons I repeat whenever asked. That’s strawmanning.

Better repeat “That’s strawmanning”, so everyone really buys it right…

I gave a wallpost on you accusing you.

@Solic

Slank cover: I’m going to apply for an uni
Important note: don’t vote me for the student council.

Would say NAI

Mercenary:

I read some
What’s your favorite romance novel?

Fluff, which is unfortunately also NAI.

Solic:

I read some
What’s your favorite romance novel?

Fluff and you die.

Mercenary:

I am too busy to play

Mercenary:

(rn) so ye

This is honestly a reply I’d expect from them.

Mercenary:

Solic threatening me for my second post in the thread DOES feel jumpy

Shadethrowy without showing much context of the rest of the thread considering I did a lot more than that. Also I literally do that all of the time and she should know that.

Solic:

You’re known to fluff.

Kind of fine to just leave it alone for a moment tbh

Mercenary:

I’m on Ici’s side here

She hasn’t shown much knowledge of the thread before, but out of nowhere she agrees with a whole threadstate read:

Icibalus:

The thread feels weird as fuck. The most analogous mechanic I’ve seen in the past is Ritual Mafia, where you have to choose a villager to ritual lynch, and yet it’s not behaving anything like that, and not as if they had to choose 4 slots who ideally all have to be villagers either.

In addition to this, and this is getting a bit paranoid, but… is it just more are people not really talking to each other about reads at all? They’re more saying reads at each other agressively and then not bothering to notice what anybody else is saying.

And yet, in a thread that’s clearly distracted and trying to process the gamestate, a 5-man flashwagon forms on me out of one post. That’s not normal.

The only conclusion I can make is that there’s a disproprotionate number of wovles in the thread, or the wolves that are in the game are the most active players.

I point that out

Solic:

I’m on Ici’s side here

Why exactly? Now that feels out of nowhere.

She reacts ultra defensive, saying I must be scum… for what exactly? I was somewhat polite throughout the conversation. Not to mention that Mercenary has tried this strategy before to just appear active by “scumreading” a townleader and not do anything else in Auction Mafia (Poker Mafia) 3.

Mercenary:

Stop jumping at my throat
I’m typing shortly because busy.
It is because I agree with his arguments that his accusers are wolfy
You are separatedly a wolf as well

Oh, she must know my ISO completely and have kept up with the thread to come to this conclusion. /s

Mercenary:

@icibalus can we agree Solic is just shading whoever he can excuse it

Mercenary:

• me
• ici

Oh it’s just herself and the guy she’s either whiteknighting or hard defending.

Mercenary:

I agree because the meme wagon on Ici feels forced as it is not purely a meme wagon (he is being pushed for reals) and you are already being wolfread for me
Also the thread lacks cooperation which is wolf ridden indicative

“you are already being wolfread for me” sounds so weak and artificial.

The second thing I can’t even read or understand honestly. It feels like some buzzwords thrown together to emulate substance.

Mercenary:

I think Hja in this wagon is town since she was the first vote and pointed out the sheeping

I like a different read after this, because it shows some more inquisitiveness.

Mercenary:

Everyone sheeped Hja with the same wording of her vote in very close timelapse
It is indicative of a meme wagon

You are being wolfread because of your overly aggressive jumpy behavior, and according Ici you also don’t discuss your reads but just point them out.

Solic:

And who are the other wolves leading this environment then?

Whoever on the Ici wagon that is not Hja

Note also the use of the passive voice. “You are being wolfread” instead of “You are a wolf”. It’s almost as if she’s not actively scumreading me, because it’s a fake read.

Her thread awareness also shows again with not even naming whoever is on the Ici wagon or calling them out specifically. It doesn’t suit her agenda at the moment.

Mercenary:

…you know what?
Why am I discussing? I’m not convincing you that you are a wolf and won’t fall for your fallacies.

Backtracksss slowly from this argument

/vote Mercenary for lynch

You just deflected it with this:

@Mercenary

Hahahaha omgus

@Solic

OMGUS is voting without a reason. I gave one.

So after you voted me, I felt fine giving a quippy response, but somehow that’s a fallacy discrediting my whole push against you of which a majority you have just ignored??

@Solic

/vote Solic for lynch

Now this is an OMGUS, because no reasons.

Last one:

@Mercenary

So I “shade” two people and that makes me scum? Why should I have townread you for not doing anything yet?

First on this post you ignore my original reason to push you and makes it look like I’m attacking something else.
Second you assume that one of my arguments is how you read me. You never gave a read on me at this point, so I could not have used that as a basis.
Again, that’s strawmanning.

Thanks for making it thoroughly hard to read this post comprehensively and I wonder if that’s intentional. Referring to something as “your original reasoning” makes it easier for the rest to actually miss what is said here. Your original reasoning was that I was “aggressive”, which I have already countered and you have refused to back up as of now:

@Solic

You are being wolfread because of your overly aggressive jumpy behavior

Point me to a town game where I’m not “overly aggressive”.

I apparently did give a read on you, because I was shading/scumreading you and you did use that as a basis… And you haven’t debunked why I shouldn’t have in that moment, because you hadn’t done anything towny up to that point, so I don’t see why I shouldn’t have shaded you.

[Marshal]

@Marshal

@Pilica i didn’t get too much out of it. I did it to humor derps mostly but he wanted to end it and so i did.

light townpoints on the people who openly didn’t buy it(and didn’t just question why derps outed our “chat”) because scum have no reason to think we are lying.

here liberal

[Mercenary]

@Icibalus

In addition to this, and this is getting a bit paranoid, but… is it just more are people not really talking to each other about reads at all? They’re more saying reads at each other agressively and then not bothering to notice what anybody else is saying.

And yet, in a thread that’s clearly distracted and trying to process the gamestate, a 5-man flashwagon forms on me out of one post. That’s not normal.

The only conclusion I can make is that there’s a disproprotionate number of wovles in the thread, or the wolves that are in the game are the most active player

@Emilia

/vote ici for lunch

1 vote

Solic:

/vote Ici for lynch

I can get behind that.

2 vote normal in RVS

Marshal:

/vote ici for lunch

SirDerpsAlot:

/vote Ici to lynch

I thought Ici quoted what Hja quoted. Oops.
I have found that flashwagon very suspicious, but thought it was a meme wagon. I scrolled a bit up the thread and saw that communication in the basis of changing reads was really lacking, so I went full Ici whilst I read later if I would keep that read.
Lately in the game I have seen it was not a meme wagon, so went to see the context. I saw that the main reason for Ici to be voted was a very flimsy read made by Hjasik, and that 4 people followed it instantly.
Do I need to explain that YET again?

[Mercenary]

I’m not wallposting on mobile

[Solic]

@Mercenary

TWTBAW is something I do as both alignments when I’m on mobile since I don’t care about being concise as “I’m developing it later”, so my reasons end up looking lazy unless I am asked why I have them.

So how can you scumread me for scumreading you when you’re self-admitted scummy when on mobile?

[Mercenary]

Anyway this game is getting me angry at irl people who had done nothing to me
I’m leaving to cool off for a bit after that mess is solved

[eevee]

Ehhh, I dont really agree?

Scum would know its false if there is scum among this 3.

I can get behind that, but would require to flip thus 3 so kinda useless read.

[Mercenary]

I never scumread you for how you read me.

[TrustworthyLiberal]

Okay yeah fair enough was hopeing you saw something that I didn’t.

Oh well

[Mercenary]

Yep, I have pointed out the same some posts ago.

[Mercenary]

Ok boomer