Before I actually go read, let me summarize this argument against me.
Marshal argues that my posts have been performative, yet he acknowledges that I likely had this pre-roll anyways. He’s connecting this to wolf behavior despite it having no correlation. My RT is yet somehow scummy for being performative in the sense that he thinks it contradicts my plan of playing the game differently. Let’s just suppose it did. If this is being read as scummy, then the automatic assumption is that he doesn’t believe me. Having a plan and failing to follow through doesn’t reflect scumminess.
The main argument is that I have been “performative”. My “change in playstyle” is NAI as I’ve planned on making that post regardless of alignment, and that my Reaction Test is performative because it seemed purposeless.
Please come up with new arguments because I’ve debunked every one of yours lmao.
Sidenote: I’m frustrated. Call this performative or whatever. I don’t get frustrated when I’m read as wolf for good reasons as town or wolf. I get frustrated when I believe I’ve been read for bad reasons, regardless of my alignment. I’ve been frustrated at SDA in Virtuous II (regardless of whether his logic was good or not), because I believed it was underwhelming when it came to justifying a wolf read, despite me being wolf. So this is me calling Marshal’s reasoning shit.
Ami has like two ways of playing laid back ami, and like in your face ami. tbh its very nai for her to not have extreme enthusiasm. Anything other than that for why your reading her as top SL with arete?
calling entrance posts very lackluster is filler? None of them took effort or time to think, something any scum member could easily fake
yeah centuries is like easy town read from his posts. All good vibes from him.
I thought that specifically calling your announcement NAI was kinda meh and performative and a couple of the things you were doing didn’t really feel like they had a Reason for them, like the vote thing or whatever