[FM] Geyde PFPs Joat9 - THE LYING DARKNESS AND FIREMAN WINS (2/2)

What analysis? You only said you thought it was more likely to be t/s, not why.

Feels pocket-y to suggest and pocket-y to agree

it’s like

t/s>>t/t>>>>>>s/s

1 Like

Would it be a fair assesment to say that you are scumreading me for trying to discredit you?

Sure, I can see that, and I can’t exactly disprove that.

fwiw, currently I’m pretty sure it’s V/V.

Close. The way in which you were trying to discredit me is mostly why I’m sure you’re a wolf.

/vote DatWazza

Ayayayyaaya

1 Like

What was it about the “way” I was trying to discredit you

I mean, I’ve literally explained that in my cases on you. You just keep dismissing it as bad and wrong.

Recap it for me

just like 3-5 sentances I don’t want a wall

Why? You’re just going to say I’m misusing buzzwords again.

Because this your last chance before I vote you :slightly_smiling_face:

You have tunneled me all game I don’t think i’m asking for much.

i dont think they have a scumgame on this site

but Ive been able to find them town in past games

id hope so?

it makes sense to me

because I acknowledge im voting one of a few people who SR’d me

i was voting arete literally the whole game and I found what they said reasonable later on and I wanted to move my vote - and sulit wasnt a bad person to do so

id rather someone votes their SR over just saying they SR

probably wouldnt - unless their reasons look like agenda(which it didnt really here)

wanted to see what Dat would say i guess

its a better question then most of mine

I dont see the harm

also wanted to see how Nappy/Arete would react

which I didnt actually look into but yes

Marshal voted Nappy right after I said not to without a reason

So I assumed he was seeing how id react

but Marshal was dealing alot with nappy earlier so they may have a different view, but I was p sure it was an RT for me

Most of my reasons on you can be boiled down to basically this: Misrepresentation and shade.

Ok so when this post was written: this “shade” i’m doing - was it attacking your alignment, or attacking your case?

This, trying to discredit my case with it.

Why do you think that trying to discredit your case is wolfy?

From my perspective, I know it’s wrong. I want to discredit it. I actively am trying to discredit it. Do you think that I, as a villager, can not discredit a case that I know is wrong?

Because you, as a villager, would have used logic to do so instead.

alternatively, it could be seen as TMI to discredit a case but not Jane’s alignment

:man_shrugging:

Sure, but I don’t think Marshal would do that tbh, he has enough experience to not TMI.

that’s

uh

not how that works

2 Likes