The fact the review process is private in the first place is a problem
we don’t have extremely strict rules on what happens
I’m pretty sure that if you don’t mention exactly what happened then its fine
How are people going to fix their setups if they don’t know what check you’ve done and why it’s wrong
this I agree with
I still think lying darkness was unbalanced for a few reasons but I aint gonna get into that
2 Likes
review is 1 on 1
it’s working with someone else to tidy up your setup (or just can it lol)
I agree with these opinions. Anarchy seemed more like a game made for fun rather than competitiveness.
I’m guessing SFoL 61 signups won’t be available for some time. Perhaps later this month?
1 Like
I got demoted for not giving them the time they deserved and instead I speedran them by clipping out of bounds
1 Like
You had extremely slanted or bastard games being hosted like Marg’s Camelot, Livicus’ FE SFoL, or Psycho’s Golden Dragon, and still we didn’t outright denied games like this and instead we just pointed out any glaring issue the setup may have had.
When the name of the game has the word Anarchy in the title. It’s a safe bet that it isn’t a serious game.
Why does everything that’s a problem always bring up Marg
It’s hilarious, the fact that she’s abbreviated to ‘Marg’ makes it even more funnier
Like I don’t think anyone went into anarchy expecting a serious game
All you had to do was read signups
anarchy was just like a fun social experiment but ended up getting reeeee’d at anyways
1 Like