Funny you decided to ignore the clarified math by Eevee debunking this strategy.
My vote stays.
1 Like
These are a few examples of posts that seemed scummy to me. The first as it seemed very LAMIST, and the second as scum using the excuse of āI donāt want to be attackedā to push their agenda is very very easy and happens like every game (esp when PKR is in it 
)
However after re-reading the thread it I think my suspicion may have been misplaced - the majority of his other posts have a reasonably strong town-motivation. Heās prolly cool.
Thoughts on policy shutting down the first major push for D1 Kingmaker, considering how blatantly you can get away with buddying in this game?
2 Likes
3 scum kingmakers - scum lost
2 town, 2 scum - town wins in case of tie only
More scum as kingmakers isnāt good for them, but risky for us as well.
I donāt really. It hasnāt really come from anywhere other than you two just saying you want immunity.
1 Like
Consider that I trust Marl actualy rn. Scum would rather know who they are playing with/against and Marl didnāt even notice Orange is not in game.
Depends on if you are scum and if not if scum think itās worth killing you. Same as everyone else.
If I get nightkilled before claimed assassin, I will take this as compliment, but we can use this to place 2 good scumreaders as kingmakers, while scum is forced to shoot Unknown.
Fairly sure there will be at least one intelligent scum who will recognize that there is a possibility that Unkown is bullshitting.
You both acknowledge the fact this game allows āsomeone who can manage keeping in non-elected non-night killed groupā, and want you and Marl pushed up ASAP, while admitting that:
Think of that what you want, but since we canāt flip you this blatant of buddying isnāt even a bad play.