I kind of don’t like how Vulgard is there with sideline comments, but doesn’t have a strong voice themselves on what town should pick when they play like a town leader normally. Also very pockety statements. 
Now I want Mount Doom to be picked just to see what will happen.
Not like we are getting another chance for this spectacle.
I still think Isengard is really good and better than the EoD1 chaos.
On second thought Mount Doom might actually be good lategame because opportunistic town hammering is much less likely to happen at that point.
Says who? I don’t trust 1/3 of the players reads in this match and I bet 1/5 won’t even read the game
Litten, we’re already having firey arguments about the very mechanism of voting itself. Now imagine if that actually goes off, and people have to actually deal with a voting system where they can only lynch wolfreads who people trust more than high villagereads.
That creates spectacle. That creates chaos. That, in short, forces the wolves to do incredibly dumb things, it forces them to break cover.
I’m not, it’s just we’re having an argument that’s not over allignment so I’m debating with him in good faith rather than descending into shoving the fact that I read him v/w in his face and ruining my actual point in favour of Ad Honinem.
I do, except the compulsive vigilante will likely cause me pain at night. It’s not even because I’m a vigilante, it indirectly affects me and makes me useless or even anti town.
Oh so I have a big voting disagreement with you and it makes me scummy, but when it is with Litten, it is suddenly “just debating in good faith” like two friendly chaps.
oh hey game started
There’s a difference there, Solic. You don’t actually have a point, Litten does. You just looked at “Doctors can act twice” and “Majority” and didn’t actually bother to think about what the latter meant.