Well, only if they coordinate shooting
They have a day chat for that.
We must conserve our shots. We start with 9.
Shooting a townie with ammo: -1 for the shot, -1 for killing someone with a shot: -2
Shooting a townie who has shot: -1 for the shot: -1
Shooting a mafia with ammo: -1 for the shot, but reduces min shots required by 1, 1 less shot mafia can remove: Around +1
Shooting a mafia who has shot: -1 for the shot, but reduces min shots required by 1: Equalish
If we lose 6 ammo without any mafia dead, we lose.
And of course they can shoot us all if our numbers go too low
Its set up were if you loose 4 bullets then mafia can endgame you by shooting 3 townies who haven’t shot leaving 2 townies with bullets left.
But imma snipe a mafia immediately so it’s okay
So every shot we have must be near perfect.
We can only afford 1 bad shot, maybe 1 or 2 more if we kill a mafia
Deciding who should shoot is nearly as important as deciding who to shoot
Indeed
What happens if at the end there will be few people, but none of them has shoots left?
Mafia wins, they win if they can’t be killed
Mafia wins if there are any. See the alternate win condition.
That means that bussing is very much a valid strategy for mafia - only one needs to stay alive.
What if we actualy voted who to shoot, see the flip, reevaluate, vote for another person?
Pretty much breaking the design of the game to something we are more used to?
We can perform “executions”.
Under the wall and bullet to the head.
Yeah. Each person has 1 execution, as judge, jury, and executioner
^ Exactly what shouldn’t happen.
No hero shooting. It will only trigger someone revenge-shooting and losing even more ammo.
The voting is meant to make sure that the shoot is agreed with everyone.
Nah fuck that I’m sniping someone