Since both are likely to flip town, it’s the overall best and safest decision to Execute the player who’s harder to read as even though one is more likely to flip mafia, it’s still not exactly likely to happen
That’s basically my current view
derps:
Player A has a 20% chance to flip mafia, but can only be read correctly 25% of the time.
Player B has a 25% chance to flip mafia, but can only be read correctly 80% of the time.
is this your next scenario, or was something going to be different?
The reason why you cant convince anyone is because of the fact that no one understands why you read the person as such and you struggle to explain it in a way other players are receptive to
I guess convincing people of a fact is one way to work at it XD
That’s basically what I said the question was going to be which is more important the chance of flipping mafia or being easier to read
Btw
From a town standpoint yes
You can just kill off Simon if you feel that he would be a problem later on
He isn’t unreadable in any means^
ok, so i ask you, in that scenario, do i have it on good authority that those read chances are precisely accurate for all parties involved?
It isn’t a fact though because my theory does have imperfections
And it comes down to what you trust more I’m working on trying to change their mind
After deliberating with the thread most people say they can’t usually read player A and save them for last/guess/similar
They say that they pretty much always read player B right with only a few incorrect reads every so often
We obviously can’t realistically get exact numbers but we can tell apart who’s harder and easier to read
I could just manipulate Simon’s chances to be scum by attacking him with every town ability LOL
I see what you mean completely.
But you’re being narrow-minded here…
Just vig them lmao
boom bye player A
Fudge that came out wrong
There are far more options to clear Player A in this game than there is in other games
then in that scenario i would probably vote for player B but not really push for that, and swap to A if consensus moved there.
It works in mountainous
But not in this
“I am this% and this%”
Player A is usually more than one person in a game
Why not take every chance to make it easie later
Ah the standard town wishy washy
Policy lynch let’s go
Why would you vote for player B over A
i think the flaw in your argument is that you are making a false assumption
that the line between hard to read and easy to read (on average) is thinner than you’re implying.
and not a 25-80% chance
For my fun and my sanity loss
I require mental afflictions so I get forced into situations that are unfavorable for me
Part of the fun is trying to figure out who is who anyway