And no one else review my game I want Suilt too!
Their Nice to me.
semi-open isnāt a setup type (even though it should be but grumble grumble)
would you describe this setup as a vanilla game?
iām asking so I can edit the queue appropriately (not guarenteeing that iām your reviewer here, by the way, just tidying up the queue before things get nightmarishly messy.)
ā¦we really ought to have another discussion about what types of games this site accepts. Nowadays, I donāt hear any āCompetitive FMsā being played at all, and I am using āStandardā type that @eevee recommended me for my Bastard++ FM, which wouldāve been considered an SFM in the āoutdated typesā.
Good griefā¦ should we make a new thread about this matter?
ā¦okay, why does it say āVanillaā here?
i donāt know, Iām not in charge of the queue
probably because Bastard++ may be dumb as shit but it is a vanilla setup, just one containing the dumbest possible roles that still fall under vanilla
if u want lots of competitive go to MU 4Head
Last competitive we had was Hell in a Cell, tbh.
And well
Hell in a Cell had dybu
dybu dabu dybu dabu dybu dabu dybu dabu dybu dabu dybu dabu dybu dabu dybu dabu dybu dabu dybu dabu dybu dabu dybu dabu dybu dabu dybu dabu dybu dabu dybu dabu dybu dabu dybu dabu dybu dabu dybu dabu dybu dabu dybu dabu dybu dabu dybu dabu dybu dabu
I feel like most people here prefer chill games
Having a few games that are implicitly stated are intended to be competitive every so often might not be a bad thing
Okay, so. Hereās three suggested changes for the OP of the thread that are drastic enough to warrant discussion and approval before I, yāknow, just fuckin put them in:
- Somewhere in the OP of the thread, we should list game types. This is crucial because of the weirdass way Discourse handles pinned threads- they still sometimes drift down from the top of the category, where they are supposed to be, for some godforsaken reason. We should also update the actual game types, but thatās not exactly a formatting issue.
- Secondly, look at the second column of the tables. This is more of a minor thing, but either it should be āMain Hostā and cohosts should not be listed in that collumn (not my ideal solution) or it should be kept as is and read āHostsā. Obviously, the Main Hosts vs. Co-Hosts distinction exists because of the well-respected tradition of VC bots, and they donāt need to be contacted for review, but we should nonetheless be consistent with our language.
- We should also have all people who are official reviewers listed in this thread, for the same reason that it is ideal that all information relevant to anybody queueing a game should be in this thread.
- Lastly, the Starting segment should probably read āIn Signups/In Progressā, because the language is vaguely unclear as is.
Some of these are more important than others, but I still think these are reasonableā¢ changes to make.
ā¦do you seriously want me to find an outdated setup with actually bastard mechanics so it isnāt called vanilla anymore? IMO Vanilla only means VT, Goons and maybe Doc & Cop.
ā¦wait, for real? I didnāt even take that game seriously.
i do not make the decisions here, and I think our categorisation system has somehow gotten worse than back in the olden days when there was only one category that actually got reviewed
Bruh vanilla is probs like 100+ roles
Well then, time to nuke you all with āvanillaā roles.
Eevee has a giant lIST of roles classified as vanilla IIRC
Iād define Vanilla as everything that Modbot on MU can process excluding ITAs and Treestump
Aye. ā¦so, which higher-ups do you think will see this, and when do you think they will have time to discuss about this matter?