[FM] Random Rolemadness Madness v2.0 - Game ended! Mafia and Survivor wins!

But she did throw shade though

@Wazza can you explain this

Yea, which was extremely well deserved, because you were accusing her of something nonsensical. There would have been more.

Thatā€™s completely NAI

Thereā€™s more to it.
Moreover, this feels like your gut just making the read for you.

I have a problem with your read of Squid. It doesnā€™t seem strong enough to warrant completely throwing the idea of voting them away.

:roll_eyes:

I didnā€™t say I townread her when you previously asked. I think there are stronger scum indicators out there.

What am I supposedly missing then Geyde?

And itā€™s not. Town Squid seeps more into AtE.

A read would have to be pretty damn strong to completely stop you from voting them.
This basically says to me that you townread them, and I find it very difficult to get any other interpretation from this.

I find it very difficult to understand your through logic here.

Are they town or are they not?

Oh really, Iā€™m ā€œcompletely stopped from voting themā€. Really now Geyde? :roll_eyes:

@Isaac_Gonzalez why havenā€™t you posted your noob list

Try to look at what they said instead of just glazing over it.
They are complaining about not having the time to do this, which isnā€™t really AtE.

There isnā€™t a case for them doing this as a given alignment, which is why I find fault in it.

This is trying to make a false dichotomy. They can be anything ranging from lockscum to locktown. Iā€™m leaning town. Thatā€™s it.

Horseshit.

And you have yet to make your case as to why they actually are lockscum.

Iā€™m not making a case on why they are lockscum.
I am making a case on why your progression is unreasonable.

Yes, with 15 players, I can find one more scummy than another.

Horseshit

Either you havenā€™t read any posts or you are trying to throw shade on me.

Huh Wazza, I also didnā€™t really understand that vote though. Not wanting to claim doesnā€™t mean heā€™s scum.

Him not hardclaiming when you asked it isnā€™t enough

Thatā€™s an oversimplification of what was said.
You used strong terms to back it up, and you are slowly backpedaling.

Given two players, you have thrown out the idea of voting Squid. That must mean there is a strong case to back up why you wouldnā€™t consider voting them. And yet as Iā€™ve seen your reasoning just doesnā€™t hold up to scrutiny.