I’m very dissapointed in anyone that did not cast a vote. 
That’s fair enough. I can see how you might think that.
That’s my line where I said one line can sway a lynch. It’s completely reasonable as per all of my lines and it doesn’t give off scum or town vibes, however it plays to an optimal point for town.
I’ve played with you for 24hrs as town and 48hrs~ as cult. I’m afraid that isn’t nearly enough to determine meta on someone.
This is a conversation closer. It wasn’t required in that sentence at all. It would have been completely fine with this;
You showed intention to close the conversation as you’d rather not have it discussed.
I’m saying you dismissed a completely good topic when it was only worth around 10 lines. It wasn’t referring to controlling a conversation unless you consider closing it to be leading it.
Moth managed to get a reaction out of Htm after a meaningless joke— And they aren’t contributing? Meaningless joke > readable reaction is not contribution?
This is a psychological read. These are very hard to fake and really good to point out. moth believed htm was scum that was trying to get people to like him so he wasn’t lynched. Obviously this is not a concious thought but subconcious which can’t be controlled-- which is why this contribution is massive.
Moth managed instead of constant questions to read them psychologically rather than asking questions and hoping they throw out something that is obviously wrong. This is a really good attribute to have and very hard to fake.
They also have confidence about their reads and aren’t afraid to out them (much like myself, which is another factor of why I see moth as town here)
Again, another psychological read which most people aren’t able to produce.
Overall the quality of their reads were much higher than I’ve seen anyone here output. If you wish to attempt to convince me that their reads here weren’t good enough then you are welcome to try.
Why does claiming to have a greencheck a liable reason to sheep anybody? There are also plenty of roles I’m sure have potential to fake greenchecks. 3p might be appear as greencheck as well.
If you find it laughable I’m sure you’d like to explain to me what you’re laughing about. I’m all ears.
He also still encouraged mass claims and his only defence was “Im town” and “I only act scummy as town”
That doesn’t say much really and I have actually seen townies do that more on this site (unfortunately )
What do you make of him trying to say that you’re confirmed town? What motivation has he behind that?
I meant the quote below in being the Derps message. Apologies for the confusion
From my cult games before I was caught do you see this as something I would do? If you want a quick read of some of my scum games if u dont know u can look at Luigis Mansion, Fol 23, NFOL 3 or Efol 3.
I have had it discussed the whole game at this point i dont really care if I have to discuss it, I was closing it then, because it wasnt leading me anywhere and I realizd my one point I initially brought up in coaching was really bad.
As I have stated already this type of check cant be tampered with
U didnt vote me after that, it took til everyone dogpiling even more onto Magnus that u proposed the cfd. Thats what i find laughable
You’re the third. And are especially scum if Magnus town. Kyo is either bad town or defending a buddy. Opportunistic is not Kyo’s play in any sense
Also he rolefished earlier.
Plus he refused to out his reads and when he did he refused to explain them.
1 Like
do you have any thoughts on magnus?
Simple.
Assume he is scum. Defending the buddy so poorly doesn’t do anything. The defense is so bad it’s too bad to be a wolf.