what do you mean?
If like to say that avoider is a very fakeable claim
I donāt understand why you people think being mean = being non-town aligned when you know itās not a rare thing for me to be angry.
Moth asked why he would kill alice, as alice āwasnāt sussing [him]ā
Then you pointed out Moth saying Sog killed sulit because sulit was suspecting Sog and said moth, canāt this apply to you?
Even though he stated before (and after, iirc) that alice wasnāt suspicious of him, you dismissed the defense
You were being mean to Moth on purpose most likely to get him to quit again
The odds of a jester/lyncher are so low that I donāt see any real reason to mention them at all. Bringing it up serves as nothing more than a distraction and I like that Conroy moved away from it. Plus, heās not wrong about moth there.
Moth was trying to fake dirt on me, sulit didnt sus me
I already wasnāt a fan of Moth early on but ok. When Sulit thought I was scum because of my meta, I guess ok, they only have played once with me. But you. No way, this isnāt town motivated. Youāre the one who knows the best that this is a bad argument yet youāre using it agaisnt me. People also town read you for very little. I smell scum.
Oh I see, didnt know about 1.
1 Like
I already said my Avoider shot on Moth was a fake claim to reaction fish and it proved to be worth it because now I think Moth is town
Moth has created an out of nowhere scumread on htm and faked the dirt on me. Is there something like an executioner? If so do they have one or multiple targets
I was pointing out the flaw in his argument, He was saying he wouldnt kill someone if they werent susing of him, yet the first person he accuses of being a killer is because they sused someone, so him saying he wouldnt kill someone unless they sused him dosenāt make much sense
Executionner kind of exists but itās modified.
Clockmaker gets an action each phase and bets on who dies. They need to get a certain amount of succesful shots to win. (Itās neutral)
(Random example)
1 Like