[FM] Ritual Mafia IV -- Day 4 (7/16) -- Heretics and Traitor Win!

Mode*

If I had god-tier gut reads that are near always accurate, I wouldnā€™t just tell people to trust me. Iā€™d try and articulate why my gut thinks the things it does, because that way people who donā€™t intuitively notice the same things as me can notice them.

hard pass on that thanks
we need a wolf lynch and iā€™m not taking a gamble on an iffy slot

sigh

Both flipped wolves have fucked up progression on Sulit and end up vaguely calling him a villager without explaining why. See my working

1 Like

How is Gorta an Iffy slot?
There probably scjm

Reasons, please.

Scum*

Whereā€™s the ISOā€™s?

Itā€™s hard when I donā€™t have fuckin ISOā€™s!

Scroll down under the OP and click on the ping. Youā€™ll receive a link to their ISO in the profile section. Itā€™s a problem we encounter when we post far too much.

Where?
Explain it to me like I was 5.

Thereā€™s a series of NAI host pings after SoD1. If you click on @Name then itā€™ll take you to their popup profile, which is where the ISO button is housed.

Although the fact that you canā€™t justā€¦ say your reasons does peturb me. Have you thought about your reads at all?

Gortaā€™s slot is iffy, to answer your question, because their voting patterns have been basically constricted to voting within a consensus block with other people, something that carried over between the sub-out, which is questionable, but it is by no means proof of anything substantial. Itā€™s merely something to keep in mind before there is a better narrative explanation.

Plus, his demeanour infuriates me on a subconcious level and I prefer not to be too hasty in calling people who I personally dislike wolves.

I donā€™t think he explained it but just put it in.

Notice how we had Kyo and Not Marshal and Kyo is right next to his name.

He asks this to Marshal

Mentions both Kyo and Marshal near the same minutes which maybe because they are both scum buddies at that time.

Itā€™s like he knew Marshal was Body Swapper

Good grief. I donā€™t think that read even meets any burden of proof for me to have general reasons to reject it beyond incredibly reachy accusations of exactly what somebody did at one particular time. You cannot read interaction-based reads off of the minutia of interaction. It has to be based on broader strokes of play.

Your logic is entirely circular, and thatā€™s something you have to fix if you want people to take you at all seriously, on the simplest possible level.

@Icibalus who did you vote for ritual?