It’s not that I don’t agree it’s that I still don’t like you very much
that’s fallacious tho
you can’t think a read is bad just because of who it comes from
1 Like
I think she’s saying that she scumreads Nappy and doesn’t want to follow her scumread’s vote
no matter if a read comes from an innocent child or a revealed scum.
the only thing that matters is the points for and against them when it comes to an argument
I would say I purposely changed my playstyle this game to counter sulit’s metaread but that’s not why.
if all of their reasons for scumreading a person is valid and there isn’t a better wagon… i’d be inclined to wagon that person, yes
the former is a lot more trustworthy to be genuine (not correct, though)
the latter is all WIFOM
so i disagree?
well no.
like what’s the difference between the first saying “X is likely scum beacause their interactions with this dead player makes it more likely that they are scum. Here’s reason X, Y, and Z about how i came to that conclusion”
and the second one saying that same thing? how does that change the arg against them
It’s not full of scummy people because Marshal is on it. You don’t know my alignment. Make conclusions after flips.
I was using an example! I scumread you, but I don’t disagree with you on Jgoes. However, I’m not going to switch off you to Jgoes, because you voted him.