My reads may be awful, but I’m sticking to them until convinced otherwise
oh
that’s more useful
thanks
Vote Count
Accused | Voters | Number |
---|---|---|
Apprentice | sulit, Napoleon | 2/9 |
Arete | DryBones, katze | 2/9 |
Appelsiini | SirDerpsAlot, Arete | 2/9 |
KyoDaz | Alice | 1/9 |
Jgoesgaming | Marshal | 1/9 |
the problem isn’t that they’re wrong the problem is that they’re fake
Haha two scumslips easy
I honestly hate ISOing which is why most of my logic I don’t have evidence for
I mean
I have TMI that at least one of her reads is wrong
I was speaking objectively, because I am aware that I can be horribly wrong. But I’m still gonna trust them, enough experience and I’ll start getting them right.
Could you explain it then?
/vote Appelsiini
choo choo
Wait no, I guess I’m a dry person after all. Sorry. I don’t get jokes
I don’t really like how passive appel is
/Vote Nappy
I read the op, I saw like 6 town prs, so I thought everyone else was VT
Or I missed something
Napoleon is most likely scum as he is giving little logic to his decisions
Stop teasing me, I do get them when I’m in the right mindset
/vote Arete
I see 10 town prs, and there is 12 town?
Basically
Appel’s reads really obviously started with a specific conclusion in mind before she read it, and then she found evidence to back it up
you can tell this because when we ask her to explain anything about her thought process, she explains why the read she made could still make sense, not why she ruled out the options she’s ruled out (she did sort of explain why she ruled out me/Alice being V/W but)
also all of her reads are built on pre-flips despite the fact that she’d never interacted with either of us at this point, which is a Common Newbie Wolftell TM
What decisions?
I voted Appelsiini for pressure.
I still don’t think u should be FoSing hard claiming
Town PRs