| Accused | Voter | Votes |
|---|---|---|
| Marcus_Doodalee | Meteoro | 1/5 |
| Meteoro | Geyde | 1/5 |
| Mercenary | Marcus_Doodalee | 1/5 |
You had a good progression on the Squid read on d0, she was acting somewhat suspicious. Meteoro pings me for his non-comittal reactions to D0 and Merc blatantly threw shade on herself which seems quite unfounded. I don’t believe she meant it as a joke either.
Thats why its hard to read. It could be blatant, it could also be town motivated but without content its simply null. Which is again why I advocate for her being the cop check tonight
| Accused | Voter | Votes |
|---|---|---|
| Marcus_Doodalee | Meteoro | 1/5 |
| Meteoro | Geyde, Luxy | 2/5 |
| Mercenary | Marcus_Doodalee | 1/5 |
I don’t like this wallpost at (screams wolf!pkr in fact) but since marcus has replaced in I’ll ignore it for the moment. Marcus contradicts himself in here, he says he likes what merc said but then votes her of a strategy someone else used in another game, when she hadn’t even replaced in at that point.
But surely if someone says something you like, that gives you second thoughts yet you didn’t even hesitate.
This is the comment I liked, its similar to my read on Luxy but also not in that I read Luxy as town for his motivation this game.
Like Squid, these comments ping me pretty hard as I don’t see why town would say them.
I would have to say I’m neutral on it when it comes to the amount of things I like about it and things I dislike about it.
For example, I like his read on you as I feel it’s justified, however, I sense a “This person I like does this, so I’m going to do the same thing” mentality without finding a way as to how he himself can come up with the same idea or something similar
As for the idea of checking Amber if she isn’t active, I’m not really a big fan of it. I would prefer if the cop searches for another null read to perhaps make a link to the checked player and how it affects the other players they had conversations with
