So you don’t have any opinion on any reasons I’ve stated for voting her?
Correct. I don’t think you’re being genuine so I don’t want to reread it either.
Town doesn’t defend someone they don’t townread
If you don’t see that you’re too far gone.
/vote Hjasik
Srsl you’re voting me because your vision of how should ppl play doesn’t match with how I play aren’t you just repeating your elementailst wolf play
It’s not “my vision” it’s common sense
Town doesn’t defend a null or a scumread.
That’s just a fact.
Not it’s not common sense I do defend null/scumreads so it’s not true
Again I am not. I have demonstrated you logically cannot be town. Similar to how I did FireKitten when they were emperor. And then Kitten ran me up.
Then if you’re town that’s actively against your wincon Hjasik. Therefore you are scum.
Yes demonstrated just how you do every game I was town before
No it’s not how is creating discussion against my wincon
When you’re defendinf someone you don’t townread that enables possible scum to live
Town don’t want scum to live.
Imagine if I then started defending you while my vote was on you. That would make no sense
Town does defend their nullread sometimes I can even link you games where I have done that as town if you want
the reason why i say don’t vote someone until you are confident in the vote is because lynch are plurality, also can we just agree that we all should agree on one certain lynch each day so to prevent random lynch?
then what is your option on math wagon? nothing but full of sheep?
That’s why I don’t vote them
Link me go right ahead.
And my response to town you there would be to be better. Town doesn’t defend a scumread
why would you do that
See common fucking sense. Like omfg
I defended insanity when he was pushed for inactivity
https://forum.imperium42.com/t/fol-experimental-forum-of-lies-2-redux-unseen-warlock-and-scorned-win/75485/345
I defended priestess for her meta when I scumread her