[FM] Yes, We Can’t Have Nice Things Because This Is A Clown Fiesta Sequel ENDGAME [3/22]

2-shot rolecop, mech oracle, flavorcop, and a really weird ability that idk how to describe it

To sum up - my problem with Arctic.
Yes, this is actual game relevant problem, as I’m trying to point out:

1st:
After we have 6 posts and I say that Ici actually was scummy and to not shoot Kyo yet:

Arctic jumps at this and starts questioning “Why didn’t we act on it”.
Well yeah… he jumps on slot with 6 posts why they didn’t manage to express opinion on Ici yet.

2nd:
When we have 30 posts and already mention Ici, Kyo, Electra and start questioning gorta vs eli incoherrency:

Arctic jumps at it, complains there is nearly no reads and all the Electra / gorta / Eli things are mechanics only and are irrelevant.
Also that Kyo read is also irrelevant and Ici is dead.

3rd:
When I tell them to stop actually being anti-town when I try to get stuff going, he just starts redirecitng it to old games and derailing the topic again.


Like… think about it.

Is really mentioning Ici and Kyo reads, as well as Electra, Eli, Gorta mechanics that small in first 30 posts in a day?

Do you really expect someone who has 6 posts to shoot someone?
Like wtf is this attitude?

I can get people being mad at lack of a reads, but you don’t fucking force someone with 30 posts to do more than 5 different approaches on people and call all of them bad.

This is bullshit and anti-town as fuck.

Is it scummy per se?
… probably not for them.

But definitely not townie.
Scum arctic could do this to derail thread and have an easy push on someone still trying to settle in.
And that’s… likely strategy.

So stop acting like he is the saint here and I’m at fault.

…eevee, everyone had literally dropped it
you tell me i’m the one continuing it-

nobody is acting like he’s a saint

the thing is, you really aren’t either

Arctic, stop trying to close the topic when I try to analyze your aproach.

You didn’t even read the post and you already say to close it.

ofc the ITA has to be Wild West FM style wasn’t it.

well thanks

isn’t that how itas normally work

Actually fuck it.

If noone want to read continuation of my analysis, I’m gonna play Payday.

look at how much of a waste of time that was

I’m going to go to hell, bye

Yeah, it still is.

Even tho we got enough of reaction from Arctic to get into analyzing it, it still is, cause noone cares.

eevee the problem is any credit your thoughts on me may have had is undermined by the fact that you clearly dislike me and think i am bad at the game
so how is anyone supposed to take what you are saying as genuine when there are other motives involved

Me considering people are bad or not doesn’t affect theirs aligment?

this certainly can

This still doesn’t affect theirs aligment.

if you want an actual serious response to your ‘read’ on me, if you’ll call it that then here

you brought up the old games first… what

the only read you have had on a living player was ‘kyo is town’ and i’m sorry if you feel like i’m being too inconsiderate by thinking this is inadequate

mechanics aren’t irrelevant
i’m asking you to supplement your contribution with reads

i never asked you to do 5 reads
in the same way i never voted eli in the joat game, but you clearly think i did for some reason

i did say that i don’t want to continue this any more though
i’m glad that you seem to be going in a more sensible direction but i don’t want to kill your slot today and i don’t see a use in discussing this more

and no, i don’t care about having the last word
feel free to respond as much as you want to this but honestly i’m just tired

There is a bit of misudnerstanding.

I want to continue talking about CURRENT game.
Discussing old ones doesn’t exactly help, and that’s what I was trying to stop.

I mean, they can be used as example for meta in current situation, but there is no point in going back and dig through/ague about old games when there is current one to go about.

And… I actually still want to discuss a moment longer.

Tell me one more thing actually.

What did you try to achieve when you first accused 6-poster, when they expressed reads on 2 people, that they are not acting upon it?

And later when you acussed 30-poster of being “lazy” when they had opinions / actions taken against 5 different people?

What was your target?
Trying to get more?
But then you would need to think it was not enough, when you can’t really say 2 opinion on 6-poster who replaced in is not enough.

Most people don’t post a single read in theirs first 6 posts in a game, put aside actually serious ones.

So that does seem your oportunistic from my PoV, so… could you explain your thought process, so I can understand it?

Btw. I think Leafia should be gone.

Remember my theory that if Eli says truth about balance faction, that basically makes them neutrals who can shape own abilities and wincon?

Yeah, that kinda removes place for other neutral in this case.

I said that but whatevs