the wincon makes no mention to a separate faction. thus it resolves to events happening or to your state.
if you survive the winter or you escape to canada you can win, but if a cure is found you can also win, regardless of who does it
Didnāt find anything in AP2
that has no bearing on what i said.
the percentage is just for everyone.
nothing says only one person in an area can be injured
Do I look like someone who seems like he would care about that?
Please donāt swear, Mr Icibalus.
im willing to claim what i did at school btw
Welp. Whether you reveal your AP1 find is up to you then.
[!] Icibalus will remember that.
Have I done enough content for this wolfy popin?
āplease, call me ici. icibalus is my fatherā
Yet nothing says otherwise. Both of us lack proof, but my āoddā hypotheses matches with the results.
I can see it.
First; any loot?
but mine makes more sense from a balance perspective.
why have some complex formula, when you can have āif you do this action right now you have an n% chance of gettting injuredā
no loot, no info.
didnt search
Who u wanna lynch?
Actually, I do have one vaguely unique thing to say:
occamās razor says derpsalot is v
Basically no townie reason
Kk
- How is RNG complex?
- How is your reasoning less complex?
- Why do we even bother talking about hypotheses when we can ask @eevee?
Alright. I will note that then.